Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: No movement in Panthers’ talks w/ Taylor Moton


Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

If you were going for the joke, then...lol

 

If you were making a comment on our leadership, then...not lol 

 

The leadership we have now is the best it's been in 15+ years.

I agree 100% that Tepper is executing on and staffing up a model that will almost certainly result in long-term and consistent success as defined by the single metric that really matters -- wins & losses.

That said, his model is a departure from that which is the norm in the NFL and Fitterer is not "the sheriff".

Patience will be rewarded!! 💥💯🧨🇺🇸

PS...I'd suggest current leadership is a step up from anything that's been in place since inception of the franchise.

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I agree 100% that Tepper is executing on a model that will almost certainly result in long-term and consistent success as defined by the single metric that really matters -- wins & losses.

That said, his model is a departure from that which is the norm in the NFL and Fitterer is not "the sheriff".

Patience will be rewarded!! 💥💯🧨🇺🇸

 

Oh, I agree that this regime is heavy into analytics. Something that fans are going to have to get used to. As we seem to be trending upward, I would say they are off to a pretty good start.

 

And since I am the one that said we have a new Sheriff, I get to call who plays  the Sheriff. And that is Fitt.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So with Paradis and Moton gone next year what exactly is the Panthers total investment in an oline?

Greg Little, a $2 bill and a bojangles sandwich?

If Darnold doesn’t work out or gets injured due to this garbage, Rhule will have no choice but to draft the next poor soul lining up behind traffic cones. No legit QB is going to dumb enough to go for that.

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tiger7_88 said:

Its not a curse or bad luck.

 Yeah, that easy answer might make you feel better, but it’s not that.

 It’s ownership/management/coaching (in that order… though, to be fair, the first 2 years of the Rhule Regime he’s pretty much been the GM as well as HC).

Yeah, I mean the answer has always been pretty obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kungfoodude said:
11 hours ago, AndrewLaskoski said:

$13.75M this year and $16.5 next year (120% of this years tag) is probably more reasonable than what Moton is asking for

He may end up just holding out if we tag him next season. 

I'm trying to remember the last player who actually held out and missed getting paid for a season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...