Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some Brian Burns love: How to identify the next breakout NFL superstar


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

"

His 1st year to his second in his rookie season he had 7.5 sacks and 16 quarterback hits 

Last year he had nine sacks and 21 quarterback hits 

In 2020 alone he had the third most hurries in the league and the third fastest average time to pressure amongst all defensive linemen.  Just 2.45 seconds, .3 faster than the nfl average 

He had the fastest time get off of point-blank anybody in the nfl: ¾ of a second is all he needs to cross the line

In 2021 he is gonna break out

"

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SBBlue said:

"

His 1st year to his second in his rookie season he had 7.5 sacks and 16 quarterback hits 

Last year he had nine sacks and 21 quarterback hits 

In 2020 alone he had the third most hurries in the league and the third fastest average time to pressure amongst all defensive linemen.  Just 2.45 seconds, .3 faster than the nfl average 

He had the fastest time get off of point-blank anybody in the nfl: ¾ of a second is all he needs to cross the line

In 2021 he is gonna break out

"

It would be a surprise(injuries aside) if he doesn't make the leap to being a 12+ sack guy in 2021. On paper, the DL and secondary took big leaps forward. This should start making these pressures become sacks. 

Every metric/stat you pointed out and others all seem to indicate elite sack production is imminent. 

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is huge may not be a trap game but this plays a major part in what they want to do. If we can get some pressure on Sam we know what he does with pressure coming hit and heavy. Also we may be able to take the top off their defense a backup safety trying to stop TMac or Cooker over the top or forcing him to play the backend should allow us to run the ball somewhat effectively. Either they allow some runs or we take some shots and if Bryce and whoever can connect deep we’ll be in business for another big time win against a top notch opponent. Might not be a trap game but health travel game plans all play a major role in each weeks game plan and this week might be leaving our way. We’re missing some replaceable pieces they’re missing key anchors to the offense and defense major difference time to solidly ourselves at one of the top teams in the nfc tomorrow fellas buckle up.
    • Yes.  If I am not mistaken, we need to sign Coker to the ERFA tender and insist that XL spends his spring and summer at a WR camp and not Coon huntin on his four wheeler.  XL was raw when we picked him--which is why I wanted to go another direction--and we are seeing how raw.  He is basically learning a position.     The Panthers will make their move in 2026 to be an NFL powerhouse behind Bryce.  Bryce needs intelligent WRs who catch the ball.  That said, we need a solid #2 to challenge XL and make cutting him easy, if necessary.  A #2 WR (intented to be a #1 by now) with under 400 yards is embarrassing.   On offense, you have to ask, "Where can we get better?"  In my view, #2 WR, TE (although they are improving) and maybe C (again, if we re-sign Mays, he is trending up and at 26, entering his prime--I say stay with him and find competition later in the draft (not good for C).  OL depth maybe?  In other words, XL is a glaring weak spot.    
×
×
  • Create New...