Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans now indicate Deshaun Watson is available for trade

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, joemac said:

We are ABSOLUTELY a QB at the level of Deshaun Watson away from challenging for the division right now. 

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Basbear said:

110% sizzle is not chuck. hes 10x smarter than old chuckster 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

    

   Despite all evidence to the contrary. And in his usual move, treat this proof like it doesn’t exist. Who else is it that admitted to being banned multiple times, and says exactly what he has preached for a year? That people fell, and are still falling for this is just sad. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Despite all evidence to the contrary. And in his usual move, treat this proof like it doesn’t exist. Who else is it that admitted to being banned multiple times, and says exactly what he has preached for a year? That people fell, and are still falling for this is just sad. 

Sizzle admitted to being chuck or being banned multiple times? Sanjay was a 2 TE memelord that got banned and that maybe sizzle, but I seriously doubt chuck is up to sizzle's posting habits along with his 10 other poo cans alts....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Sizzle admitted to being chuck or being banned multiple times? Sanjay was a 2 TE memelord that got banned and that maybe sizzle, but I seriously doubt chuck is up to sizzle's posting habits along with his 10 other poo cans alts....

   The first post is from here, months before SB signed up. With word for word identical thoughts about the team being run like a TV show. 
 

  The second is from Pats board where he wants Cam to “subjugate” himself to Belichik. Much like all players should do what the owners tell them. With the username RASTAN99 much like his RASTAN66 on here. When I challenged his comments I got this. Not sure what else you need as proof? 

 

 

On the Game Day Roster
Aug 4, 2020
You do realize they have banned me repeatedly? That's why I can't post anymore.

Do you remember the guy who presented the detailed expected value calculations that supported bringing back Cam? 

Yeah that was me.

Remember the guy who kept harping on "optionality" and maintained that Tepper would for sure bring Cam back because from an "optionality" perspective it was the only logical move to make?

Yeah that was me to.

Do you remember Kyle Bailey talking on WFNZ about the concept of "optionality" for months and using it to support his position that the Panthers could & should bring Cam back?

Yeah he got that from me.

By the time I squeezed back onto the Huddle with the name similar to this one the deal for Teddy had already been made to the narrative changed. Huddle disappeared all the expected-value and optionality content, not sure why the RASTAN66 stuff was allowed to stay up.
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cookinbrak Grand Master

cookinbrak

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, onmyown said:

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

Also, the miscreants fail to comprehend that if you give up draft picks, you can't get players you need for 2-3 years.

A better possibility would have been to buy Tom Brady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, onmyown said:

Good lord the homerism is embarrassing.

Statistics, history, and logic say otherwise - based on the division last year.

You’re simply hoping a ton of areas improve. Hope is not absolute. And it doesn’t trump observation or history (last year).

For instance a DeShaun Watson on last years team would not have won the division. The rankings just aren’t there. Statistically speaking, success with such poor team rankings such as last year, has been done like before literally a few times in all of NFL history what in the holy hell are people thinking when they post stuff like that…give me numbers and logic that is based on, no feelings or ‘potential’ please.

 

 

Would you be willing to post a list on how we should fan properly? I mean, c'mon man. Let the kids have some damm fun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Verge Veteran

Verge

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Peanut Butter said:

How do y'all trash Jerry Richardson then want this guy lol

I would personally take a break from this franchise for the duration of his tenure on the roster if we ended up trading for him. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The NFL has non-guaranteed contracts. They HEAVILY favor the team. You just love watching people having to bend the knee to authority figures.

Complete horse-hockey and more virtue signaling please!   LOL. 

Contracts are a 2-way street and agreed to by both parties...

...if either side feels it's unfair they should decline to sign.  

Own it.  

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

Complete horse-hockey and more virtue signaling please!   LOL. 

Contracts are a 2-way street and agreed to by both parties...

...if either side feels it's unfair they should decline to sign.  

Own it.  

But if a team decides to terminate the contract you have no issue with that. If the player attempts to utilize his leverage (because he CAN'T terminate the contract) you howl like crazy. Bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TLGPanthersFan
      Canes vs Flyers Rd 2 Gm 1 Saturday 8pm

      By TLGPanthersFan · Posted

      Not looking good for TB. Buffalo and Habs fans are the worst so I will be cheering for the meteor. 
    • frankw
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By frankw · Posted

      Arguing about who had what and who did what with more is just going to end in the same charades. If we're going to waste a lot of hot air arguing then make it about something that cannot be denied. What you are seeing with your own two eyes. Cam Newton was a tremendously talented athlete albeit flawed in fundamental aspects. And although he played poorly in and lost a Super Bowl you cannot deny him that more often than not through his prime his teammates knew they could count on him to hold up his end of the bargain usually and be a key driving force for keeping them in games. Giving his defense much needed rest and motivation in wanting to match his grit as a competitor. That aspect is just not there with Bryce Young. Yeah he's dumped on the Falcons in a dome twice but what about his other 44 games? When has the Panthers defense the last three years ever looked at their starting quarterback and thought to themselves "man I'm so glad he's my QB"?
    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
×
×
  • Create New...