Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our vaccinated rate vs Washington…what’s the difference? Ron Rivera “very frustrated”


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

 

If it was my 72 year old mother who is morbidly obese and is generally unhealthy and poor?

I'd say that sucks but that's life. She had a long and somewhat interesting life.

Everyone is going to die some day from something. Nobody is promised anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

If it was my 72 year old mother who is morbidly obese and is generally unhealthy and poor?

I'd say that sucks but that's life. She had a long and somewhat interesting life.

Everyone is going to die some day from something. Nobody is promised anything.

 

Your cavalier attitude towards life is appalling. You are a reprehensible human being, who will endanger everyone around you. Please go away, and spew your ignorance elsewhere.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Your cavalier attitude towards life is appalling. You are a reprehensible human being, who will endanger everyone around you. Please go away, and spew your ignorance elsewhere.

It's not cavalier but yes I do think people's lives under the age of 50 are more valuable than those over 50 and I'm over 50.

That's just a fact. They have way more life ahead of them. What honestly is the quality of life for the average 85 year old in America?

I'm 51. I understand I don't have that much time left. I much rather leave the twenty thirty something kids a robust economy and life than to wring my hands over a virus THAT I HAD that is 99.9% survivable.

Will I distance? Sure when possible but I'm not going to avoid planes and elevators.

Will I wear a mask? If I have to but the data is showing it's not very effective but I'll give it a better than zero percent chance.

You sure brushed over Ivermectin didn't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Inimicus said:

Just running the greatest hits of right-wing retorts today arent you?

No, I consider Jama or other non government medical sources credible when it comes to this pandemic.

The left are the ones that have politicized this virus and blown it up into a bigger deal than it is.

Sure when it first hit and nobody knew much about it caution was definitely in order. But it seems to me like Florida got it right after all.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catsfan69 said:

if it's less lethal then it's weaker. i don't care if the whole country gets something if it does not kill them.

Also seems hospitalizations are down even though infections are up. describes weaker.

 

it spreads easier and is more lethal for small children (who don't have the option to get vaccianted currently).....

that doesn't describe weaker.  It describes a variant that is stronger against a segment of the population that is heading into a school year.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

No, I consider Jama or other non government medical sources credible when it comes to this pandemic.

The left are the ones that have politicized this virus and blown it up into a bigger deal than it is.

Sure when it first hit and nobody knew much about it caution was definitely in order. But it seems to me like Florida got it right after all.  

Literally vacationing right now in Florida and every time the news airs it is talking about how hospitals are overwhelmed and trying to show folks how dangerous the virus is.

Even more so than in SC.

You're trying to force your beliefs over knowledge and it's pretty gross tb100.

Also, hospitalizations are down in general due to folks getting vaccinated as it doesn't prevent infection but rather gives your body a chance to fight and win.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

if it's less lethal then it's weaker. i don't care if the whole country gets something if it does not kill them.

Also seems hospitalizations are down even though infections are up. describes weaker.

 

Hospitalizations are down because over half the country is vaccinated… I feel better knowing you are just trolling and don’t even believe your own poo you are posting.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like people were warned that if they didn't take the virus seriously and work together to prevent its spread that it would inevitably mutate which would lead to a second pandemic.

bUt mUh hAIrcUt

fuging spreadnecks smh

Edited by Icege
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...