Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terrace Marshall Jr


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Honestly, Darnold. If he captures the ghosts and rides them, then it’s a top offense. If the ghosts ride him, shades of Teddy where wide open guys don’t really matter.

This is also predicated on Marshall = healthy stud WR. I like what we are seeing but he’s not playing a top secondary right now.

Injuries are an underrated possibility to torpedo our season. We loaded up on guys with rather suspect injury histories to go with a few of our other oft injured players. 

I can remember more than a couple of seasons completely derailed when the injury bug settled in to the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, stbugs said:

He’s a faster Bryant but seems close in size. His pro-day he was 6’3” 205 and he doesn’t look 205 now. He may have dropped weight to run a 4.38. Bryant didn’t run at the combine but was 6’2” 225 and ran 4.52. Maybe Marshall has bulked up since the pro day and got a wee bit slower.

A touch smaller Andre Johnson?

That's sort of what I'm seeing here I believe.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, stbugs said:

He’s a faster Bryant but seems close in size. His pro-day he was 6’3” 205 and he doesn’t look 205 now. He may have dropped weight to run a 4.38. Bryant didn’t run at the combine but was 6’2” 225 and ran 4.52. Maybe Marshall has bulked up since the pro day and got a wee bit slower.

He says he's 210 and closer to 6'4".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't see Marshall in the Andre Johnson model. Andre Johnson could've subbed in at LB.

Thats why I said a smaller Andre.

Andre was tall and fast...much like Terrace, just had another 15-20 pounds on him.

I'm not sure who he reminds me of to be honest.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...