Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther in each of next 4 HOF classes?


Santee_Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

This author predicts Mills gets elected next year and Smith not until the year after. Then Peppers and Luke as first year ballot guys. 

I believe if Mills doesn’t make it next year he moves to “senior” status. Sounds like most believe Smith, Peppers and Luke are three locks of when, not if HOFers. 

https://thegruelingtruth.com/football/predicting-the-next-five-pro-football-hall-of-fame-classes/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be in the minority here, but I'm not so sure Sam Mills is a Hall of Fame worthy player.  Was he an amazing, emotional leader?  Absolutely.  Was he one of the greatest LBs of all time while on the field?  Ehhhhhh.....IDK about that.  Love the guy, love his message, just not sure if hes one of the greatest ever. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joemac said:

I may be in the minority here, but I'm not so sure Sam Mills is a Hall of Fame worthy player.  Was he an amazing, emotional leader?  Absolutely.  Was he one of the greatest LBs of all time while on the field?  Ehhhhhh.....IDK about that.  Love the guy, love his message, just not sure if hes one of the greatest ever. 

Yeah, Sam Mills means much more to the Carolina Panthers as a LB, coach and inspiration.  I'm not sure the NFL recognizes that he was truly dominant.  He was great in so many ways, but I'm not sure of the HoF.

Smitty, Pep and Luke are all locks.  I think that Smith and Luke are 1st ballots.  There were absolutely dominate, best at their position.  Smith did his best work when the Panthers were a run first team.  It's crazy when you consider his effectiveness compared to guys who played in more high volume attacks.  You knew it was going to 89, and he still dominated.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mills was a great LB though. Played a very long career and was a 5x pro bowler (when it meant something) and 3x All-Pro, despite being extremely undersized for a LB. That combined with the context of his time with the Panthers (I believe he was the longest tenured original player, and then obviously the leadership as a coach and literally inspiring the team's motto) I think is enough to get in the HoF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

I didn’t realize Smitty was 9th all-time in all-purpose yards.  Only behind Brown and Rice among pro bowl WRs.

There’s his jacket right there.

Smittys career stats make him a lock.  Like others have said, probably not first ballot just because, but no doubt he will get in. 8th in receiving yards. 9th all purpose yards. 12th in receptions.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Santee_Panther said:

So if Smitty, Pep and Luke are locks, and Mills is possible but iffy, who is next most likely?

Cam? Olsen? Thomas Davis?

None of those seem likely according to “the numbers” here

I think Cam gets in on his rushing statistics. He had rushing TD numbers that were greater than the best RB's of his era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam wins the Pats QB spot this year and goes on to have a few more years of starting success then yes. If he loses the job to Mac Jones and that is the end of his career then I don't think he does get in. That sucks but I think it is the reality of it.

Edited by mccjeff
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, d-dave said:

Yeah, Sam Mills means much more to the Carolina Panthers as a LB, coach and inspiration.  I'm not sure the NFL recognizes that he was truly dominant.  He was great in so many ways, but I'm not sure of the HoF.

Smitty, Pep and Luke are all locks.  I think that Smith and Luke are 1st ballots.  There were absolutely dominate, best at their position.  Smith did his best work when the Panthers were a run first team.  It's crazy when you consider his effectiveness compared to guys who played in more high volume attacks.  You knew it was going to 89, and he still dominated.

Sometimes a player is more than his stats. You can't measure heart on a stat sheet and Mills had one of the biggest there was. He made everyone around him better. That, combined with his stats, I think he gets in. There needs to be some recognition for that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, hepcat said:

I think Cam gets in on his rushing statistics. He had rushing TD numbers that were greater than the best RB's of his era.

Cam gets weird. 

He is #1 all time in rushing TDs by a QB at 70.  Second place is Steve Young with 43.  

He is #2 all time in rushing yards by a QB only trailing Vick.   He needs 711 yards to jump Vick.  Which means Cam just needs to log probably 2 more seasons. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the way it should be. the way it has to be.  when you get a rookie (no matter where he is drafted), you don't expect him to play like a vet or even get a grasp on NFL offenses like a vet. if you intend to have him running the offense, you build the offense around what they do and what clicks.  not Young's fault, but he was sold as someone who would be a rookie but has the mind of a seasoned vet. guess what...he wasn't. reich and "his" crew had no idea how to work with a rookie QB or groom one. they thought they knew, but they didn't and it was obvious in the lack of plan they had for him. their plan was to treat him like he was a seasoned vet. even with that, i don't think they had any clear vision not just with Bryce, but with the offense. There was no cohesion between all the various coaches. nothing fit together and reich wasn't a strong enough leader to pull it all together.  i like the approach of starting over with the fundamentals and i think it's good for any new coaching staff or new QB to a system. you don't know what to expect so you start from the beginning to make sure you're on the same page from the beginning. and as you get more used to each other, you learn what works, what could really work well, and what won't work and you form the playbook around that. contrast that with chud who had been working on a playbook for years and just wanted to use it regardless of whether the situation called for it or the personnel he had (on the team or even on the field) fit what he wanted to call.   or last year when we had coaches from completely different backgrounds trying to put something together that was supposed to be a blend of what each brought to the table, but just ended up being a sloppy predictable mess that didn't fit anyone on the team, QB, WRs, and OL.
    • I've always been super pumped up for the upcoming season but I've never been so uninterested in a new season. After six years under Dipper I've been left at end of season drunken and wallowing in my own piss... not invested in the team right now but hope Canales and Morgan make a good team together...
    • There's no discussion anymore, it's just a circle jerk about how bad Bryce is, and it got old a while ago. 
×
×
  • Create New...