Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers are trading LB Denzel Perryman to the Las Vegas Raiders


AndrewLaskoski
 Share

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

These guys are clowns. All that drama for a guy who practiced like twice and got beat out of a starting role. There are much better reasons to question rhule and fitterers moves. This isn’t one of them.

Agreed. Much ado about nothing. 

And his mush mouthed explanation of his source describing a nonsensical exchange between a player and Rhule was nothing. 

Similarly from the poster's description of him being a "dictator" isn't this literally how about half the coaches in the NFL are described? That isn't an isolated thing. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

I've never heard of him. I admittedly didn't watch as much NFL football in 2020 as I did in previous years. 

In all honesty, I'm for signing or trading for anyone that can help the team. If you believe McGovern can do it, and his cost is reasonable, I'd say go for it.

For me, I just love the speed and length of Smith. He's almost a Kam Chancellor type of talent if used properly due to his measurables. With Chinn and Smith you'd almost have a Thomas/Chancellor dynamic. However we would be in a better position on the boundary with Horn than Seattle was with Sherman, in my opinion.

Of course neither option will happen. And I don't believe that Snow is a Bradley or the other DC (forgot his name).

The word on McGovern is that the Cowboys view him as a starting quality guard but they have too many people ahead of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I hate sounding like a broken record but all anybody who covers this team on social media or radio does is complain and create drama about everything.

That's what happens when losing becomes the norm and all fans have to talk about is the draft or the potential of next season. Yes some of it is aggravating but you can't blame the fans of the media for the product on the field.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

That's what happens when losing becomes the norm and all fans have to talk about is the draft or the potential of next season. Yes some of it is aggravating but you can't blame the fans of the media for the product on the field.

I'm not blaming them for the product on the field. I'm blaming them for their reactionary tactics.

If there is anything to report the default mode it to spin it to the negative to rile up the reponses.

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, CanePantherHornet said:

It's probably BS but who knows

I'd say there's a pretty good chance

Used to be the bullsh-t "I've got a source" stories came mostly from Guy With A Website. Anymore it's Guy With A Twitter or Guy With A YouTube Channel.

Still bullsh-t of course, just on a different medium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

That's what happens when losing becomes the norm and all fans have to talk about is the draft or the potential of next season. Yes some of it is aggravating but you can't blame the fans of the media for the product on the field.

Losing was the norm under the old braintrust.

The current one hasn't even been in place long enough to have a "norm" yet.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I'm not blaming them for the product on the field. I'm blaming them for their reactionary tactics.

If there is anything to report the default mode it to spin it to the negative to rile up the reponses.

Agreed on the nature of social media which obviously thrives on negativity. But we just see more of it because it has been years since the team has been relevant for winning anything of significance. The Hornets social media pages aren't any better and they haven't been to two championships like the Panthers on top of losing the franchise once already.

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Losing was the norm under the old braintrust.

The current one hasn't even been in place long enough to have a "norm" yet.

Valid. But with all sports teams there is a honeymoon period and the one for this regime will officially end with the '21 season. If Darnold is a success the tide will turn and there will be a much needed boost of positivity. If not well things will start heating up like any other sports franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KSpan said:

Again, I'm not making definitive statements. The difference with FA though and particularly the guys signed is that there is already extensive film on them. Expectations can be reasonably set and thus far they're right on par with those performance-based expectations, which were fairly low.

Thus far based on one pre-season drive?

Ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Thus far based on one pre-season drive?

Ok.

Erving's been nicked throughout camp and Elflein's been unremarkable/unnoticed so yes, inclusive of that and camp in its entirety. This isn't complicated. No one is making a definitive statement but they both have years of performance to measure against and thus far are what they appeared to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Erving's been nicked throughout camp and Elflein's been unremarkable/unnoticed so yes, inclusive of that and camp in its entirety. This isn't complicated. No one is making a definitive statement but they both have years of performance to measure against and thus far are what they appeared to be.

Yeah, it would be different if they were out there crushing it in the preseason and there was some dramatic difference we were seeing. That hasn't been the case. When you have sucked for years, the onus is on you to prove you don't suck, not for everyone else to assume that you figured it out. 

Sort of like Greg Little. After just one season it was pretty obvious was the situation was but we still had people holding out hope all that "potential" was going to be realized. Gotta show up and prove that poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Dragoon11 said:

Do we have room this season to IDK... sign a good LT?

Im afraid not, given there are only about 15 real LT, 10 OT trying hard, and 7 RT larping as LT. Its rare to have a true LT, better odds for a good QB than good LT. 

16 hours ago, trueblade said:

 

Fitts more of a college guy. I think with Dan Morgan coming in as our pro guy, next year we will do better with FA.

Im not ready to call this FA class, my first reaction was very poor, but Im not form the future. About the only thing I liked was perryman and low salary mid-level players.... Arnold reports keep bring hope to save it, along solid play form DL play for Jones/Fox/Reddick along the line. If ERV&ELF just play average I will be amazed. No lie, Im still shocked his first "big" targets where ERV&ELF. 

It is a good point about Dan helping the pro side form the panthers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was once a player in MLB who was traded for himself. He was part of a trade that involved a player to be named later (one of the many aspects of MLB that keeps me from never taking it seriously). He didn't work out with his new team so they shipped him back as the player to be named later. The Denzel Perryman saga with the Panthers reminds me of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

There was once a player in MLB who was traded for himself. He was part of a trade that involved a player to be named later (one of the many aspects of MLB that keeps me from never taking it seriously). He didn't work out with his new team so they shipped him back as the player to be named later. The Denzel Perryman saga with the Panthers reminds me of this.

There's a film with Marco Scutaro (A's legend) called A Player to Be Named Later. He went on to have a decent career and was an afterthought in a trade somewhere down the line. Fun times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Sure!  Do you one one lying around somewhere?

Yeah, I guess I see the point... it's about as hard as finding a "good" NFL QB. Maybe the word I should have used was "serviceable"... is that on our roster currently? (why did you have to do the whole reverse psychology on me damnit!?) lol

Edited by Dragoon11
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The way this FO attacked this offseason it’s tough to envision them continuing to trot out someone as unreliable and dumb as Legette. There’s expectations now, potentially jobs at stake and Legette’s had his chances  
    • I think Bryce is about to become a top 10-15 QB for the next decade. I also think we’ll sign him to a reasonable deal compared to some of these monster contracts QBs have been crippling franchises with lately. I’ve developed that much confidence in Tillis & Co. 
    • A lot of people in the community seem to think Carolina will go pure BPA at 19, but I don’t really see it that way. I do think this front office has put itself in a good position after free agency. They’ve been aggressive, they’ve improved the roster, and they’ve taken away the pressure of having to force one specific position. That part is true. But that still doesn’t mean this will be a true best player available approach. There are still spots on this roster that clearly need more help than others, and I think those positions will naturally narrow the board. The good news is that because the team improved multiple areas, they now have enough flexibility that their pick can still look like BPA. It just won’t be BPA in the purest sense. It’ll be more like BPA within a cluster of positions still in play. With pick 19, the odds are pretty high that a player at one of those positions will match both value and need. Here’s how I see the roster right now. Offense QB — Bryce Young X RB — Chuba Hubbard X Chuba is productive, Jonathon Brooks should return from injury, and Trevor Etienne gives them another option. Running back is not a draft priority. WR — Tetairoa McMillan X WR — Jalen Coker X WR — Xavier Legette In play He’s still young and worth developing, so I wouldn’t call this a major need. But if a high-end receiver unexpectedly falls, we could absolutely pull the trigger. TE — Ja’Tavion Sanders Very much in play We don’t really have a true TE1. We haven’t had one since Greg Olsen. Kenyon Sadiq would make a lot of sense if the board falls that way. LT — Rasheed Walker X Between Ekwonu and Rasheed Walker, tackle doesn’t feel like something they’d attack early. LG — Damien Lewis X C — Luke Fortner X Not a priority compared to other needs. RG — Robert Hunt X RT — Taylor Moton X Defense LDE — Derrick Brown X NT — Bobby Brown III In play He’s a nose tackle who doesn’t particularly stop the run that well. An upgrade could definitely be in play within the first 2–3 rounds. RDE — Tershawn Wharton In play He struggled last season. On a Super Bowl contender, he would ideally be more of a rotational piece. Defensive interior overall still feels like a unit that could be improved. Our #2 DI last season was A’Shawn Robinson by a mile, and we lost him. WLB — Nic Scourton X LILB — Devin Lloyd X RILB — Trevin Wallace In play Wallace has flaws in his game. Slightly below-average LB right now, but he could still develop into a solid depth piece. I wouldn’t rule out linebacker within the first two rounds. In the first round though, the only realistic option without reaching would be Sonny Styles if he somehow falls to the 10–13 range and we trade up. CJ Allen and Anthony Hill Jr. should not be considered at 19. SLB — Jaelan Phillips X LCB — Mike Jackson X Mike Jack should now be viewed as a pillar of this defense. SS — Tre’von Moehrig X FS — Lathan Ransom Very much in play Free safety is one of the most realistic upgrade spots on the roster. Lathan Ransom profiles more like a strong safety than a true free safety. RCB — Jaycee Horn X NB — Chau Smith-Wade In play Nickel could definitely be addressed early. Adding a true difference-maker in the slot (or another CB and moving Jaycee inside more often) would make this secondary much stronger. Final Take — TLDR This is why I don’t think Carolina will follow a true BPA approach. They’ve improved enough in free agency that they aren’t forced into one desperate need anymore, which is exactly where you want to be going into the draft. But the roster still has a few spots that clearly stand out more than others. Because of that, I think the Panthers will draft using a multi-position BPA approach, not a full-roster BPA board. Most realistic early targets in my opinion Tight end Defensive interior Free safety Linebacker Nickel corner with wide receiver as the possible wildcard if someone unexpectedly falls. At pick 19, that’s exactly the type of situation where value and need are most likely to meet. Realistic Picks at 19 Kenyon Sadiq Caleb Banks / Peter Woods Dillon Thieneman Sonny Styles (via trade up if he falls) Jermod McCoy / Avieon Terrel Jordyn Tyson
×
×
  • Create New...