Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is the backup QB ?


catnip
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Tinamedina said:

This is the most yall have ever cared about a backup QB. Grier won, no he is not better.

This is not the most this place has ever cared about a backup. Matt Moore of recent memory comes to mind as a much more talked about backup here. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Varking said:

This is not the most this place has ever cared about a backup. Matt Moore of recent memory comes to mind as a much more talked about backup here. 

Throughout a pretty solid portion of the 2003 season, there were multiple people pushing the idea that Chris Weinke should start.

As utterly ridiculous as that sounds now, it really happened.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Wasn't Weinke like 30 when we drafted him?

I do not think the Temple thing is a factor.  Grier won the battle, and you want the iron that is forged when the heat is the hottest.  I do not see keeping both duds--we keep 1 or neither.

In that case, PJ and Will were forged at room temp.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
    • Give me Blake on the 3rd  
×
×
  • Create New...