Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deshaun maybe to the PANTHERS?!?! What?!!


Vader704
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ace420 said:

We have arguably the best offensive weapons in the NFL. Top 3 WR group, best RB in the NFL that can catch as well as run and a decent squad of TEs 

Our offense is much better than miamis. 

He might not like the front office or the coaching staff.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tommy Jone said:

I would trade for him. 2nd or 3rd, and work out his contract with the intent of shelving him for two years until this resolved and/or blows over. 

Just being honest. 

Doesn't sound like the Texans are coming off the price, so even with conditional picks as part of the deal, I don't think I would pull the trigger at the price they want. Three 1st round picks and two 2nd round picks would severely hamper our rebuilding efforts.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I'd be surprised if the rumor wasn't coming from the Texans.

...or Watson's agent.

Of course, now it's the Dolphins story that's picking up steam.

Probably worth noting that Charles Robinson is a way better source than Mike Florio.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

...or Watson's agent.

Of course, now it's the Dolphins story that's picking up steam.

Probably worth noting that Charles Robinson is a way better source than Mike Florio.

Robinson indicates it's a source from a team that was involved at some point, so that actually makes sense. I don't think Watson's camp cares much about leaking trade information at this point. They have their hands full with the off the field stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rico6 said:

He might not like the front office or the coaching staff.

There's so many possible reasons he would or wouldn't want to play in a certain region/city. Just saying the tweet alluded to us being one of the teams he wouldn't accept being traded to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, rico6 said:

“It pretty much is unanimous except for the people reporting differently” like Ben Allbright. You don’t have to lie to bolster your claims man. Just say you put more faith in the copy and pasted tweets from local reporters. You might be vindicated later. The problem is you want credit for being right when it’s not settled, that’s all.

Allbright's not someone I follow as he isn't a great source for Panthers information.

But since you mentioned him...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...