Deshaun maybe to the PANTHERS?!?! What?!!

[Donald LaFell]

I can’t really get on board with it, he seems like a full blown sexual predator. 

[*FreeFua*]

17 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Key words being "For now..." That's a qualification. No need for mental gymnastics and semantics.

Ding ding ding 

[kungfoodude]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Yeah, man. Scot seemed to relish telling me how we weren't really interested in Fields, per reports, but I told him that just because we weren't interested doesn't mean that Rhule and company didn't fug up. Of course it's preseason, but everything I've heard says he's been nothing but the real deal. 

We won't know if we fuged up for a few years, most likely. If the Bears are smart, they will let Fields ride the pine and let Dalton take all the shots while Nagy rides him into unemployment.

Scott is just doing the "pretending to not have an opinion but clearly having an opinion" thing. It's fine. He's been staunchly anti-Watson after the allegations started to come to light. I get it.

 

[top dawg]

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not sure the door was ever really open.

All we've ever seen were rumors based on the idea that Tepper "would pay any price" and such, which was pretty clearly bullsh-t since Tepper doesn't interfere in personnel decisions.

The one story we've seen that actually addressed anything substantial came from Albert Breer. When he was talking about what led to the Darnold trade, he mentioned the team looked into Watson but since the Texans weren't even answering calls at that point, they decided to look elsewhere.

That's pretty much it.

There were more reports than that. Come on, Scot! Don't get selective with your reports. Like I told Kungfoo, you were all too happy to believe the reports about Fields...

If there was as little interest as you're intimating, then Jones and Person wouldn't have used the language that they did in their tweets. 

[Mr. Scot]

14 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

*Shot down For now*  Anything else?

That's pretty much all that matters.

The rest depends on future events.

Edited August 28, 2021 by Mr. Scot

[Hoenheim]

This thread will be 100 pages long and will be like the 1000 other Watson threads 

[top dawg]

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We won't know if we fuged up for a few years, most likely. If the Bears are smart, they will let Fields ride the pine and let Dalton take all the shots while Nagy rides him into unemployment.

Scott is just doing the "pretending to not have an opinion but clearly having an opinion" thing. It's fine. He's been staunchly anti-Watson after the allegations started to come to light. I get it.

 

I get it too. LOL

[onmyown]

1 hour ago, joemac said:

How can anybody poo on Sams play last night? From what I’ve seen he looked fantastic. 16/21 2 TDs, no turnovers in a half of work? What’s not to like? That being said I’d definitely still be looking to get Watson as he’s a dramatic upgrade from Sam all things considered. Watsons never had a supporting cast or OC like he would have here. He could win the MVP if he’s actually on the field. That’s where I’m at. 

He played second/third stringers…is not to like.

[raleigh-panther]

4 minutes ago, Ace420 said:

He can he have a criminal trial of he hasn't been charged with anything?

This isnjust women shaking him.down for money. Asking a woman for sex is not a crime.

Sorry, but it depends on the circumstance   Ever hear of ‘sexual harassment’?
 

[Jon Snow]

4 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Yep

…particularly for a city and a franchise that remembers Rae Carruth.

 

Even if found 100% innocent  it shows a tremendous lack in judgment.

[Coheed]

1 minute ago, Ace420 said:

Prove he assaulted women. You do know that women lie, especially when there is millions of dollars involved right?

There’d be some merit to that if it wasn’t over 20 accusations. That’s a pattern and it’s a problem. If we ever trade for him I’d have to reevaluate my support of team, and I would be far from the only one. Keep him the fug away 

[top dawg]

1 hour ago, joemac said:

How can anybody poo on Sams play last night? From what I’ve seen he looked fantastic. 16/21 2 TDs, no turnovers in a half of work? What’s not to like? That being said I’d definitely still be looking to get Watson as he’s a dramatic upgrade from Sam all things considered. Watsons never had a supporting cast or OC like he would have here. He could win the MVP if he’s actually on the field. That’s where I’m at. 

I don't think anyone is shitting on Darnold as much as they're keeping his performance in perspective. There were some good moments, but there were some sketchy ones as well...against the twos. I think for many people, we didn't really learn a damn thing about Darnold last night; we're still waiting for the season.

[Harbingers]

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

You want him on your team after all the allegations that have been thrown his way? Yikes. 

Did you not read conditional? 

[Mr. Scot]

9 minutes ago, top dawg said:

There were more reports than that. Come on, Scot! Don't get selective with your reports. Like I told Kungfoo, you were all too happy to believe the reports about Fields...

If there was as little interest as you're intimating, then Jones and Person wouldn't have used the language that they did in their tweets. 

There was never more than rumor, and pretty much all those turned out to be bullsh-t.

I get that you wanted it to be true, but it's just never looked that way.

Edited August 28, 2021 by Mr. Scot