Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ian Thomas vs Tommy Tremble


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know we're all down on Thomas lately but he actually had a mostly pretty good game. Was solid in the receiving game on very few looks (and was wide open in the end zone when Darnold missed him) and did have some other nice plays as a blocker. Tremble was also good as a blocker. Arnold didn't show much but, again very few looks. Clearly Brady doesn't utilize TEs in the passing game much. I'm fine with rotating these 3 guys like we did yesterday, none of them are great at this point but as a whole I don't think the position is a massive weakness or anything. No reason to get rid of Thomas.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Zod said:

Take a look at this play right here by Ian Thomas bottom right of the screen.. 

giphy.gif?cid=790b7611a99f28ad0f0fbb1fd6

Thomas gets tossed like a rag doll by 47 who ends up making the tackle on CMC. 

 

Isn't this why we drafted Tommy Tremble? 

Thomas has to be able to make that block or he shouldn't be on the team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...