Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints likely without two starters

shaq

By shaq,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

shaq Mentor

shaq

Posted
  • Author
Posted
36 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Means nothing.  Historically, whenever they've had injuries, they still tend to whoop our ass, usually with the position that was decimated by injury.  Remember last year when they started like 3 practice squad guys at WR?  How'd that go?😂

That was the game Marquez Callaway turned into Randy Moss haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AsylumGuido Collaborator

AsylumGuido

Posted
Posted

While Davenport may miss a short bit of time, I would not be surprised to see Lattimore in there Sunday.  He played the second half with a cast on the thumb.  He can do the same after the thumb is stabilized via surgery.  He better with a cast on his hand than 90% of the CB's in the league completely healthy.  That said, I don't see anything that really scares me about the Carolina passing attack that our other CB's cannot easily handle.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Seltzer Veteran

Seltzer

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, AsylumGuido said:

While Davenport may miss a short bit of time, I would not be surprised to see Lattimore in there Sunday.  He played the second half with a cast on the thumb.  He can do the same after the thumb is stabilized via surgery.  He better with a cast on his hand than 90% of the CB's in the league completely healthy.  That said, I don't see anything that really scares me about the Carolina passing attack that our other CB's cannot easily handle.

Right... we have two 1k+ receivers and a healthy CMC... no problem at all...

There is a 0% chance Lattimore plays this weekend BTW

Stains fans wonder why everyone hates them and they constantly conjure up images of a league-wide conspiracy against them...

No one cares nearly as much about the small markets Saints as Stain fans wish they did... ultimately, you choke every year and have won 1 SB in 50 years.  

It's like Croatia thumping their chest for having made 1 World Cup Final in 100 years...

Literally no one outside of your little Swamp bubble cares... 

Some of the more mentally deficient ones among you act like you invented the wheel 

Panthers fans at least know our place in the greater world...

And FYI, your other corners ain't stopping Robby, DJ, or CMC Sunday.

Who Shat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...