Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule defends Joe Brady

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rmoneyg35 Proficient

rmoneyg35

Posted
Posted

I agree. The game shouldnt had been as close as it was. We turned over the ball in the end zone, missed a XP field goal, punted when we should have kicked a FG, had some key drops and multiple penalties, I know the one holding penalty by Elfein probably cost us a drive. Also dropped TD pass by Thomas.  It the first game of the season so you can expect there to be more mistakes. We should have had 10-17 more points if it wasn’t for the mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, NAS said:

Yes, don't know if it's Rhule or Brady but there was no intensity / urgency on the offensive side of the ball coming out in the second half.  It reminded me of Fox and Rivera.  

Rivera and the tried and true method of sitting on a FG lead to start the second quarter.

Tried and true meaning its obviously going to fail

Edited by Fox007
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
Posted
Just now, PantherGuy said:

I still think Brady largely called a good first half but totally botched the second half. The difference clearly shows in the offensive stats in each halves. In the second half it took a full quarter before he adjusted to the Jets' pressure.

How much of it is Brady or Rhule being too conservative with the lead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Maybe we should have been more hard on Rhule.

 

Maybe your brand new offense needed more snaps under game conditions in the preseason. That way timing and execution could be better. 

I can definitely get behind this idea.  I realize they were trying to limit exposure given the 17 game season, but we certainly didn't look fully "ready" on offense.  Defense always starts faster than offense and all that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panther'sBigD Mentor

Panther'sBigD

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, frankw said:

They'll get the benefit of the doubt when they actually win something in our division.

Has nothing to do with benefit of the doubt. You all are bitching about 'trends' when you have one game to go on. The steaming, hot, shitty takes you guys are making on this board days after a win are hilarious, but also exhaustingly dumb.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Panther'sBigD said:

Has nothing to do with benefit of the doubt. You all are bitching about 'trends' when you have one game to go on. The steaming, hot, shitty takes you guys are making on this board days after a win are hilarious, but also exhaustingly dumb.

Actually the redzone woes were present throughout last season too so that is a trend that has followed us into this year unfortunately and remains a thorn in our side until shown otherwise. Hopefully they show much better results against the Saints.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Monday practice tweets

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...