Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Inactives


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Deonte has to be in Rhule’s dog house for something.
As much as he preaches “best 5 guys” while our our OL gets blown off the ball.  And pushed backwards on short yardage and redzone.  He continues to keep the only guy to generate push in preseason inactive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I get wanting Brown to play, but the staff thinks he isn’t ready. I was pumped when Christensen came in last game, but quickly realized what the staff already knew. He isn’t ready yet either.  

I get they see him more than us.  But it was clear as day that he looked the better player in preseason.

 

if he was coming out of App State and also the starters were  playing solid, I could understand.  But he came from one of the biggest factories in history and guys out of there come ready enough to atleast play early.  In addition,  our starters aren’t playing good.  They’re struggling mightily.

 

 

on top.  If you remember when we first drafted Brown.  Rhule was on record saying he needed to get down to 330 from his 350.  Fast forward 2 weeks ago when someone asked Rhule about Brown,  all Matt said is he was making progress and he was down to 330 and he needs to continue to shed weight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ncfan said:

I get they see him more than us.  But it was clear as day that he looked the better player in preseason.

 

if he was coming out of App State and also the starters were  playing solid, I could understand.  But he came from one of the biggest factories in history and guys out of there come ready enough to atleast play early.  In addition,  our starters aren’t playing good.  They’re struggling mightily.

 

 

on top.  If you remember when we first drafted Brown.  Rhule was on record saying he needed to get down to 330 from his 350.  Fast forward 2 weeks ago when someone asked Rhule about Brown,  all Matt said is he was making progress and he was down to 330 and he needs to continue to shed weight

Preseason is a lot different. Dumbed down offenses and defenses, plus I don’t think he was playing against starters. If it was Ron I’d be more upset, but I trust Rhule and Co right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ncfan said:

Deonte has to be in Rhule’s dog house for something.
As much as he preaches “best 5 guys” while our our OL gets blown off the ball.  And pushed backwards on short yardage and redzone.  He continues to keep the only guy to generate push in preseason inactive

No Rhule is pulling his best Rivera and keeping the vets out there instead of running the rookies. We will see him when this crap line has cost us enough games to be out of the playoff picture. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...