Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Regarding Anderson's Rant


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's right, last two weeks they been sitting on our same routes and we haven't hit them with any doubles. Maybe going forward it'll happen but its good that the players get to express themselves. Coaches can yell at the players so if a coach is clearly fuging up then the players should be able to say some poo within reason like Rhule said.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those two haven't often been in sync for some time now. Just gave him that new extension figure it out. Rhule picked Joe Brady address issues with your staff. This shouldn't still be going on we had a decent opportunity for a get right game at home and instead we melted trying to sit on a two point lead.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year some thought that it was Brady scheming around the weak OL and Teddy was holding us back.    Brady's play calling has looked so bad this year, and Teddy has looked pretty good in Denver....

was it Teddy making Brady look better and not the other way around?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Unfortunately, neither is Spanish (see above)

Yea you just throw it down the sideline...like slant and gos don't require a lot of time nor does a short hitch and go. Throw it right after the first move is being made and they can catch and run. 

Also max protect...there's plenty we haven't tried.

 They keep doing these outs with RA so no an out and up isn't going to fly but other poo is just fine. 

Edited by Fox007
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

Last year some thought that it was Brady scheming around the weak OL and Teddy was holding us back.    Brady's play calling has looked so bad this year, and Teddy has looked pretty good in Denver....

was it Teddy making Brady look better and not the other way around?

Teddy told us where a lot of our issues were last year in terms of focus in practice etc too.

Still glad he's gone.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s unfortunate that our fans are banging on Robby for his production this year.  Brady and this offensive line are doing him no favors. Couple that with the fact that Sam had missed him on a few deep balls and this reaction is to be expected. 
 

With that said, Robby has to make that sliding third down catch yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...