Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If David Tepper


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

Actually reads these boards I would like to tell you the following:

1. You are a god damn clown

2. The way you treated cam was nothing short of despicable 

3. the fact daquan Jones is disgracing the number 90 is nothing short of despicable 

4. keeping Marty Hurney as long as you did was a joke and shows you don’t have a clue and don’t care about 

5. You are becoming dangerously close as a worse owner as Jerry Richardson and he was creep

6. you’re a god damn clown. I can’t imagine cutting the single most Important player in franchise history for Teddy and Sam.

7. Matt Rhule keeps getting fatter

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NJPanthers12 said:

Actually reads these boards I would like to tell you the following:

1. You are a god damn clown

2. The way you treated cam was nothing short of despicable 

3. the fact daquan Jones is disgracing the number 90 is nothing short of despicable 

4. keeping Marty Hurney as long as you did was a joke and shows you don’t have a clue and don’t care about 

5. You are becoming dangerously close as a worse owner as Jerry Richardson and he was creep

6. you’re a god damn clown. I can’t imagine cutting the single most Important player in franchise history for Teddy and Sam.

7. Matt Rhule keeps getting fatter

I actually prefer Richardson. Tepper is 20-35 with no division titles or playoff appearances. 
 

Richardson took us to the Super Bowl twice, NFC Championship 4 times, Playoffs 8 times, and won the division 5 times. 
 

One of those Division titles/NFC Championship game appears was in the Franchise’s second season ever. 

This is Teppers 4th season.

Most importantly he brought the franchise here. Him being a creep doesn’t make him a bad owner. It just means he was a creep.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ickmule said:

He’s 100% a worse owner than JR if we are only looking at the football side.  

Yeah, if we ignore the fact he was a prev.  Richardson was a football guy.   It was more than an investment and toy for Richardson. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Yeah, if we ignore the fact he was a prev.  Richardson was a football guy.   It was more than an investment and toy for Richardson. 

Not disagreeing he was a perv. But as far as football operations he was lifetimes ahead of this assclown. 
 

Who knows same stuff may come out about Tepper years later too, I don’t think any of us seen JR in that light back in the 90s and 00s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sunday ticket is $5 as well
    • Or if you're going to bet the farm on a small guy who will get rocked by NFL players on a regular basis he better be special. That's what I heard. Regardless, him being vague about it is kind of my point. Few in the media raised any concerns about Bryce's game outright. His passing ability was highly praised across the board even after Stroud had the more impressive Pro Day. There was the dumb debate around batted balls that eventually got squashed and I remember some game tape blogger types talking about his poor footwork, but even that was hand-waved away because he was a "dynamic playmaker" and we had a respected coaching staff that could fix him.
    • Seems to me that the Bucs have less fight in them now than they had in week 16. The real test is going to be if the Panthers can sustain focus and discipline throughout. With the Bucs being at home, maybe that gives them a little boost of confidence and energy.  Wouldn’t it be something if for ONCE the Panthers came out and dominated from the opening snap and just took this shook Bucs team to task?  If the Panthers see-saw form follows, we are in line for the W. Hard to say we have momentum but we do have a pretty clear pattern of following a loss with a win.  I’m going to say 24-16 Panthers!!
×
×
  • Create New...