Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who wants to go on record and IN FAVOR of trading the farm for Watson?

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Do you want us to Trade for Watson  

115 members have voted

  1. 1. Should We Trade the Farm for Watson?

    • Yes
      43
    • No
      72

Recommended Posts

Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Have you been away the past 24 hours? Cam has been two threads, and mentioned in many others. I keep bringing him up trying to get more people to join me in getting others to stop talking about him. It's a crusade I can't do alone.

Just tell them we dont need a RB given Hubbard&Freeman's play...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You want a real head scratcher, the best total ranking unit(1997) and the worst total ranking unit(2000) both finished with a 7-9 record.

Oh yeah I was going to make a similar comment about some good it did when we still sucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

It's funny that you think Houston would take an oft injured RB with a huge contract, an overpaid receiver that is having issues catching a cold this season, two firsts and a second for an "elite" QB in his prime. Teams were offering three first round picks for the number three rookie in this past draft and you think that sad offer will net Watson?

For the record, I don't want him. It'll cost way too much and this team is in no shape to compete even with him.

CMC's contract is not "huge", it's perhaps slightly high for a really terrific player when he's on the field. It's not outside the realm of believability that someone would roll the dice on CMC, especially when he hasn't really suffered anything major. His contract becomes a better value over time, provided that he is playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, top dawg said:

CMC's contract is not "huge", it's perhaps slightly high for a really terrific player when he's on the field. It's not outside the realm of believability that someone would roll the dice on CMC, especially when he hasn't really suffered anything major. His contract becomes a better value over time, provided that he is playing.

CMC's contract is bigger than the majority of RBs these days. It doesn't matter that he hasn't "suffered anything major." All those little injuries add up and equal the same thing, he's not available to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

CMC's contract is bigger than the majority of RBs these days. It doesn't matter that he hasn't "suffered anything major." All those little injuries add up and equal the same thing, he's not available to play.

His contract outpaces a few others by like 2 or 3 mil per year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Let me introduce you this team.  They are called the Carolina Panthers and historically could give a rat's @ss about fixing an OL.  Been this way the better part of 25-years.    Sure, the one draft  we lucked up and got Jordan Gross because the Vikings could get their card turned in on time we fielded some decent OLs with him here.  Besides that, it's always been a patchwork band of misfits.  Some units less embarrassing than others, but this team has NEVER been known for investing in the OL and fielding an elite unit.

Seriously though, has there ever been one season where pundits were like “That Panthers O Line is something to be feared”. Maybe 03 when they were all roided up? Other than that it’s been slim pickings. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Paa Langfart said:

Funny to see the folks that wanted JR crucified for no actual sexual assaults give a pass on a guy that has 10 sworn criminal complaints against him. I guess you know how I  stand regardless of how badly it would hamstring this team for years to come.

I don’t think that’s the same cohort at all. People who didn’t give a poo about what Jerry did likely don’t give a poo about Watsons deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cdparr7 Grand Master

Cdparr7

Posted
Posted

Only if there are conditions. Those conditions being we get picks back for time missed and picks back for players traded if he misses time. 
 

Say we trade a 1,1,1, a 3 and Robby Anderson, and Dante Jackson. 
 

We value Robby at a 4 and Jackson at a 2. 
 

If he misses no time over 2 years it’s solid. If he misses say a season we get half back. If he misses 2 years we get 75% back. If he’s out longer than that it’s all back. If he misses half a season we get 25% back.

Only way I’m doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
58 minutes ago, top dawg said:

CMC's contract is not "huge", it's perhaps slightly high for a really terrific player when he's on the field. It's not outside the realm of believability that someone would roll the dice on CMC, especially when he hasn't really suffered anything major. His contract becomes a better value over time, provided that he is playing.

We could totally get at least a first for CMC on the open market. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      They're examples of denying reality. Here are some others: ,- Bryce is the worst QB in the NFL right now (no he isn't) - Bryce is the worst QB in NFL history (no he's not; that's stupid) - Well then Bryce is at least the the worst QB in the league over the last three years (nope, he's actually improved a lot since year one, which was a turbulent year anyway) - That's not true, he hasn't Improved one but since his rookie year (oh come on) 🙄 - Well, even if he did, we can't win with him (obviously we can) - Yeah but not unless everyone else is damn near perfect (think the game film from our wins this year would back that up?) - Even so, we won those games in spite of him (officially the stupidest argument available) And no, those are made up. You can find those quotes and other equally moronic statements in various threads around the board. I know some folks always need to characterize whatever they're against as the worst thing in existence. It's hyperbole, and it's hypersilly. Likewise, you've got some who are so absolutely emotional about it that even if you think Bryce isn't good enough (which I do) they'll still call you a stan if you don't agree to label him the lousiest passer in existence 🙄 It's just dumb, and it's not realistic. But on the flipside, here are some statements which are; - Bryce is indeed capable of both playing in, and winning, an NFL game. Not on a consistent level though, and consistency is huge. - He is also capable of completing mid-range and even some deep passes; hell, he threw a beauty this past Sunday  - Yes, he has improved over his rookie season and over last year. Arguing against that is disingenuous. - Believe it or not, other players are the roster do make mistakes in games also.  - And lastly, while I know it hurts some people's narrative and arguments, Bryce does indeed deserve credit for the winning games he's played in this season. ... Every single one of those statements is true. And since i acknowledge all that, I must be in favor of keeping him in place then Except I'm not 😕 ... Don't know of anyone who doesn't think he'll get the fifth year option. Not ready to guarantee anything beyond that, though. So bottom line: Yeah, Bryce is fully expected to be our quarterback through next year. If there were a logical, realistic path to acquire a more capable starter and transition Bryce to a backup I'd be elated, but that's a pipe dream. This where we're at  I don't **** it, you don't like it, others don't either. But here We are so let's make the best of it that we can.
    • carolinanimal
      Ekwonu doesn’t get dog walked under 2 minutes in the 4th, we drive, kick a FG and win

      By carolinanimal · Posted

      What does it matter how fast the wrs are with Bryce he is not hitting them anyway
    • frankw
      Ekwonu doesn’t get dog walked under 2 minutes in the 4th, we drive, kick a FG and win

      By frankw · Posted

      Let's be real. Signing Matt Kalil who was at the time inconsistent at best was always an extremely risky move and largely initiated by the fact he was related to one of our most prominent players Ryan Kalil. Memories get fuzzy the longer time passes I guess. Go watch some old Panthers games with Ted Ginn nearly losing us games. Then watch Cam Newton keep going back to him again and again and again. Then read all the Xavier Legette criticism while making excuses for Bryce being swept by rookie 2nd round pick Tyler Shough. Throwing TMac under the bus is just further proof how deranged the Bryce Young defense force has become. Bryce Young can barely compete in this gutter iteration of the NFC South. Let's see him take this WR core to the playoffs in an NFC South with Drew Brees and Matt Ryan
×
×
  • Create New...