Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers HC's - Winning % Through First Two Seasons


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He was on the last year of a contract in a clear tank season.  He thought he was a lame duck coach, and he was right.  I agree with everything else though.

Fox got the Panthers into the Super Bowl in 2 seasons, but I think the league passed him by.  He wasn't nearly as good later on with Denver.

You have to have meant Chicago right

DEN 2011 8 8 0 .500 1st in AFC West 1 1 .500 Lost to New England Patriots in AFC Divisional Game
DEN 2012 13 3 0 .813 1st in AFC West 0 1 .000 Lost to Baltimore Ravens in AFC Divisional Game
DEN 2013 13 3 0 .813 1st in AFC West 2 1 .667 Lost to Seattle Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII
DEN 2014 12 4 0 .750 1st in AFC West 0 1 .000 Lost to Indianapolis Colts in AFC Divisional Game
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

You have to have meant Chicago right

DEN 2011 8 8 0 .500 1st in AFC West 1 1 .500 Lost to New England Patriots in AFC Divisional Game
DEN 2012 13 3 0 .813 1st in AFC West 0 1 .000 Lost to Baltimore Ravens in AFC Divisional Game
DEN 2013 13 3 0 .813 1st in AFC West 2 1 .667 Lost to Seattle Seahawks in Super Bowl XLVIII
DEN 2014 12 4 0 .750 1st in AFC West 0 1 .000 Lost to Indianapolis Colts in AFC Divisional Game

Yeah I'm misremembering things.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

what was the team's winning % the last full season under the previous coach before the new guy took over. 

This will determine whether he made improvements, stayed the same, or made the team better. 

Capers was starting from scratch.

Seifert took over a 4-12 team.

Fox took over a 1-15 team.

Rivera took over a 2-14 team.

Rhule took over a 5-11 team.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SingleMalt said:

Sorry you’re right…don’t want to get in the way of your poo on the coaching staff thread during a rebuild 

It's really weird how some Panthers fans get more upset about legitimate criticism than embarrassing losses to bad teams.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, SingleMalt said:

So I’m supposed to be concerned with our coaches record DURING a rebuild.

nah……I’ll wait

 

If you don't poo on everyone, and everything. You are labeled a Cockeyed Optimist, or a Homer. If you want to sit at the cool kids table, you gotta throw some poo.

 

Last year, everyone knew we had a crap team. But somehow this year it is supposed to miraculously turn into steak and potatoes.

 

It's a rebuild folks.

Jake isn't coming to save us like he did Foxy.

Cam ain't coming to save us like he did Rivera.

And the supplemental draft isn't coming to save us like it did for Capers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 10/25/2021 at 5:13 PM, kungfoodude said:

Note: This does not include interim coach Perry Fewell's 0-4 record in 2019.

I will update this periodically through the season to track Rhule's ranking.

1. Dom Capers - 0.594

2. John Fox - 0.563

3. George Seifert - 0.469

4. Ron Rivera - 0.406

5. Matt Rhule - 0.400

1. Dom Capers - 0.594

2. John Fox - 0.563

3. George Seifert - 0.469

4. Ron Rivera - 0.406

5. Matt Rhule - 0.357

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2021 at 5:13 PM, kungfoodude said:

Note: This does not include interim coach Perry Fewell's 0-4 record in 2019.

I will update this periodically through the season to track Rhule's ranking.

1. Dom Capers - 0.594

2. John Fox - 0.563

3. George Seifert - 0.469

4. Ron Rivera - 0.406

5. Matt Rhule - 0.400

 To be fair at this point we need to tank so his numbers should go down.

 

But..... we never in Capers or Fox's first two years thought about tanking. We were building and excited. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This place was screaming for Rivera’s head two weeks into year three. I like to think it was what prompted River Boat to be born that year. 
 

Difference in them and now is that you could see a future with Cam at QB. We are a rudderless ship right now. 
 

If we give Rhule another year and he starts slow, this place will be whipped up into a frenzy (with good reason). 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, bigdog10 said:

This place was screaming for Rivera’s head two weeks into year three. I like to think it was what prompted River Boat to be born that year. 
 

Difference in them and now is that you could see a future with Cam at QB. We are a rudderless ship right now. 
 

If we give Rhule another year and he starts slow, this place will be whipped up into a frenzy (with good reason). 

Rivera strung some wins late in year 2 to earn a year 3. You are dead right about him coming out conservative again and going Riverboat to save his job and earn a year 4.

I haven't seen Rhule do a anything yet to earn a year 3. There is still some games left but it's looking bleak for him at this point, which is an improvement from Sam's last start where it looked like he might not make it to the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in the current era of the NFL, the rebuild is every year and the normal  turnover with retirements, cap casualties,  and free agent departures are around 30 to 40% anyway

my concern is not rebuilding. My concern is that during this rebuild there is massive regression which points to not only mishandling the normal % of departures but failing at coaching, drafting and free agency to improve holes and plug in replacements 

One of Rhule’s core philosophies  of versatility vs  doing on position to the highest level is incredibly stupid in the nfl.   The reverse is actually true.  Players need to be the best of the best at their core position and if they have ability to play any other position with a degree of competence, that’s a plus.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...