Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where everybody go?


PanthersGOATFan336
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

Quote a post where you were “rooting” for your team

You perceive blind loyalty at all times as the only way to be a fan that's your opinion. I've seen ten years of this fanbase trashing Ron and Cam and everyone in between  relentlessly so again this is nothing new if you can't handle it that's on you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t be too harsh on them, the human condition thanks to our evolution causes our brains to react much more quickly and aggressively to negative or upsetting information, it’s why modern news is only ever really bad news, it’s gripping and forces audience reaction, sometimes as great as our brains are, they work against us, so I don’t like to blame others it is simply what we are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

18 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

We got curb stomped by the 1-5 Giants. The offense has scored 1 TD in the past 2 weeks. The Falcons defense is 27th in points allowed. We won't be able to run 46 times for 200 yards against everybody. Against average defenses, we'll have to rely on Sam. And he ain't it. Sorry. 

You can say we're negative posters but we're just living in reality. Sam isn't the answer. This offensive line is garbage. Robby is trash and overpaid. Matt Rhule and Joe Brady are incompetent. Tepper is a chode. We're regressing. 

.... 1 TD in the past 2 weeks.... thats a rough stat to let sink in...dayum.

Edited by Pimpdaddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its feels like most people online only use the interwebz/SM to complain&bitach. Thats just the current system, very sad. The news channels found this out before interwebz, the higher rating came form negative&depression news. Many tried to have a focus on positive stories, but the human attention dropped greatly. Another people problem and their wiring....

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, frankw said:

You perceive blind loyalty at all times as the only way to be a fan that's your opinion. I've seen ten years of this fanbase trashing Ron and Cam and everyone in between  relentlessly so again this is nothing new if you can't handle it that's on you.

Been here 12 years myself and I’ve never seen this much overwhelming negativity. I just wonder why someone would waste their time and energy on something they find so awful.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...