Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who do you want as the new coach?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Big Kat is slowly going off the deep end like he did last time he got banned. The pointless thread making is getting worse 

The fact that every post I make, you're in it shows I own real estate in your mind. If you run into me at the condo, I'll pay you for the percentage I own up there.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CashNewton22 said:

Man you only start negative posts/threads that’s why it’s hard to take you seriously. 

Hedge Fund guys know when to hold and when to cut bait. Rhule is NOT THAT GUY. He needs a Bill Belichick Browns kind of dismissal and maybe on his next run he will be a better coach. This guy was given TOO MUCH, TOO QUICK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheBigKat said:

Hedge Fund guys know when to hold and when to cut bait. Rhule is NOT THAT GUY. He needs a Bill Belichick Browns kind of dismissal and maybe on his next run he will be a better coach. This guy was given TOO MUCH, TOO QUICK

Bro, one would have to be completely idiotic if you think Tepper is going to fire his coach in year 2 of a 7 year contract.  Its just not going to happen no matter how many threads you start and whine about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Bro, one would have to be completely idiotic if you think Tepper is going to fire his coach in year 2 of a 7 year contract.  Its just not going to happen no matter how many threads you start and whine about it.

there's buyout clauses

the fact is he pissed off most of the NFL Owners when he handed an unproven college coach such a long term deal with that kind of money making him the fifth highest paid NFL coach https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/patriots/who-are-highest-paid-coaches-nfl-2021-season

 

Sorry but Rhule does NOT deserve to be the fifth highest paid NFL coach. Tepper buying out his contract is the equivalent of you going out to buy a pack of gum, it's not that big of a deal to him financially

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

there's buyout clauses

the fact is he pissed off most of the NFL Owners when he handed an unproven college coach such a long term deal with that kind of money making him the fifth highest paid NFL coach https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/patriots/who-are-highest-paid-coaches-nfl-2021-season

 

Sorry but Rhule does NOT deserve to be the fifth highest paid NFL coach. Tepper buying out his contract is the equivalent of you going out to buy a pack of gum, it's not that big of a deal to him financially

Penn State will be able to muster up the cheese to buy Ruhle out of the contract as well. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Hedge Fund guys know when to hold and when to cut bait. Rhule is NOT THAT GUY. He needs a Bill Belichick Browns kind of dismissal and maybe on his next run he will be a better coach. This guy was given TOO MUCH, TOO QUICK

It's year TWO. It hasn't even been a full two seasons and we have a better or same record  of the following teams....Vikings, Seahawks, 9ers, Bears, WFT and Colts. That's multiple playoff teams from last year and multiple really good coaches. Should they also be fired?

Goodness gracious y'all get a grip! We weren't supposed to make the playoffs anyways now in spite of Darnold we still have an outside chance thanks to our defense that Coach Rhule helped build....I don't expect us to but all of y'all making these ridiculous over reaction posts act like we're supposed to be great already. I know you desperately want us to be New England but we're not. We're trying to build it and yesterday was an absolute stinker but with a competent QB I believe we win that game. Changes are needed and adjustments should be mandated but give this man some time and at least let the season play out before making lame threads like this. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...