Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam removed from banner inside BOA?


therealmjl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Harbingers said:

 

I would not put it past them that they chose that picture for the banner because it has BOA in it. It’s a weird photo to begin with. 

I actually think you are right, fwiw, having looked at some others.  I don't think there was animosity in the choice but it is weird not to use a picture that includes the biggest reason we made it that far.  Then again, at some point the Panthers started to see cams brand as competition I think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

I actually think you are right, fwiw, having looked at some others.  I don't think there was animosity in the choice but it is weird not to use a picture that includes the biggest reason we made it that far.  Then again, at some point the Panthers started to see cams brand as competition I think.

The day Rhule was hired as coach. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

Okay. A picture that does not have our MVP was used as our banner instead of one that also included him which I’m sure isn’t hard to find.

the question remains, where is our MVP?

Just a note on this. The organization likely selected from their set of internal photos that wanted to show this happened at BoA.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

I don’t know why people are being willfully ignorant then.

Tbh, I'm not sure when those banners first went up etc... So I'm hesitant to say this is a deliberate slight. I agree it's strange to exclude him though.  I do think that if you want to focus on BoA as the site of this victory it's probably the best of those pictures from the link I posted... There's better pictures by other outlets floating around they could have paid to use I suspect but I don't know how that works out.

Edited by mav1234
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, firefox1234 said:

Yea, Cam was that good. How tragic lol.

And it eats him up. 
 

As soon as another player makes a bigger impact, or we start winning, the Cam conversation will fade. It’s really that simple. They act shocked that stars have fans, and lots of them. Most of NC; atleast the urban areas, are Cam fans. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

This is from the Panthers site posted after the team got it's rings.

a3vize7ofv2qubs4yg8e.jpg

Case closed. 

I love to bitch about this organization as much as the next guy. And I love CAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM. But this whole thread is nitpicky especially when it's been debunked that he was previously included and then removed. 

We definitely did him dirty on more than one occasion but this isn't one of them. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

There's better pictures by other outlets floating around they could have paid to use I suspect but I don't know how that works out.

As @Zod and others will probably attest, image licensing and copyright negotiations can get complicated. It's easier to go with the photos generated internally than it is to license from a third party.

that's not even taking into account the work that goes into cropping/zooming/adjusting for banner production

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also hit the over.  Banking on Man City running up the score and Leeds getting a lucky strike.   
    • Tailed you.  Also Free Play, which is why the risk shows $0.00. Let me look at hoops and get back to you.  Always fade Hubert, haha. 
    • Hard to say right now, but good thinking.  I look at this as the info we need for free agency.  Looks like we are going to free up about $10m so far; watch to see if any contracts (Moehrig, Horn, Brown, etc) are reworked the first week of March.  Then after free agency, we will have a pretty good idea. Right now, to be fair to your question because I am sure you are aware of its timing: In free agency, I see us adding an OT of some sort and drafting one at some point.  It all depends on how they view Ickey, Nijman, and maybe BC.  That OT could be Nijman.  I do not see the future OT--just a stop gap. I see the Panthers signing a free-agent center.  I think the market is strong.  I see Fortner from the Saints as a prime candidate and his salary is estimated at $6m by Spotrac.  the Saints are $42m over the cap, so I doubt they are able to re-sign many of their own.  He will be 28.  I also expect them to re-sign Corbett (depth) at a vet min ($1.5m) deal. I also see free agency as a strong area to get a free safety who can play and is under age 30.  Hawkins, Cook, and Bryant are all around age 27-28, play at a high level, and should be had for about $15m per. EDGE: Arnold Ebiketie is a good value because he gets pressure at a high percentage.  He had 2 sacks and Atlanta just drafted 2 pass rushers last year.   He has a 70+ PFF rating and will (Spotrac) demand about $9m.  While he is not the answer, he is a great third down option with Princely and he would allow for Jones, Scourton, and Princely to develop.
×
×
  • Create New...