Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

O-Line not as bad as we thought, neither is Brady, which leaves....


Dragoon11
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Fox007 said:

Yea that one holding call was bs for sure but he got beat on the play anyway it was just a quick hitter. He's the worst OL right now but only having one shitter is a dramatic improvement from having only ONE good OL. We'll take it

absolutely! I didn't think he played that bad. It just felt like he was an easy target for the home team officials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rico6 said:

starting to look like Sam was Rhule's guy at this point. Playbook was completely opened up today for PJ.

I wouldn't say completely... coaches knew PJ was starting his second NFL game. And with Cam... obvious. They didn't open it up per se, they just called plays based on the skill set of PJ, CMC and Cam.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

Honestly, I think the bigger impact on the game today was having a healthy CMC back. Dude had more yards alone than the entire Cardinals offense. His simple 5-8 yard runs help the O-line, quick check down passes helped the QB and the O-line. We go as CMC goes now. We just needed a QB not to sabotage us with turnovers. I don't expect Cam to come in and carry this team, his energy and stable QB play is all that we need right now. 

I agree, but those simple 5-8 yard runs help make 3rd downs more manageable, which we have to credit the O-line. Cardinals defense is no joke and I think the Panthers O-line did a great job today. And you're spot on when you say we do not need a QB to sabotage the game. If Cam can come in and manage the game without turnovers, and our run game dictates the flow of the game, the Panthers have a shot. That being said, the O-line did great today. We need them to stay healthy and continue to play inspired.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RJK said:

Removing the energy suck that is Sam darnold and adding Cams positive vibes woke this team up. It can’t be emphasized enough how detrimental Sam was to the psyche of the panthers 

It was sooo apparent... I just hope it can carry them, time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, rico6 said:

starting to look like Sam was Rhule's guy at this point. Playbook was completely opened up today for PJ.

From the postgame…it sounds like we didn’t get to see a lot of it.  Got out to such a big lead but Rhule said they had a lot Of deep play action put in.  But they just got up so quick they couldn’t really get to it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, RJK said:

Removing the energy suck that is Sam darnold and adding Cams positive vibes woke this team up. It can’t be emphasized enough how detrimental Sam was to the psyche of the panthers 

When Rhule was like "I don't want Sam to be the leader" or whatever, that was the dumbest poo ever. Cam just saved his job for a couple years and Cam's being humble about it

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rico6 said:

starting to look like Sam was Rhule's guy at this point. Playbook was completely opened up today for PJ.

I'm not sure how you get that it was completely opened up.  We attempted like 2 deep balls, maybe just 1.  We just ran the ball super effectively.   The turnovers and short fields got us our points.  It was a great game and a team win but to say this indites anyone positively or negatively is a huge knee jerk reaction and you are just jumping to the conclusion that you want.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • At a certain point these late rounders just become like UDFAs. I personally don’t see much value in them. Looking at our draft history we haven’t had a good 5th-7th rounder in 10 years. We actually had a pretty good run of them with Hurney. Hardy, Norman, AJ Klein, Munnerlyn. But yeah the past 10 years we may as well have not even had the picks so I’d just as soon not trade back to add a worthless 5th rounder, and is also the reason I felt the trade up from 33 to 32 for the 5th yr option was so worth it because ultimately swapping a 5th for a 6th rounder seems absolutely meaningless.
    • There are multiple TE and multiple CB at the top of the board right now - definitely not the time to trade back when need matches value like this
    • This is the part of the draft where you have to take a good hard look at which players fit your scheme and culture.  Outside of the 4th round there isn't really a huge difference in who gets drafted vs quality undrafted free-agents. We are more than likely going to trade 101 if we can pick up another 5th or 6th. That would be a spot where we can draft for need/BPA.  If I were Dan Morgan, I'd be focusing on TE or Edge rusher.  If they really think Franklin is truly a late 2nd or 3rd round talent, that would be a solid move.  I really like Cade Stover, but not at 101.  If I were to identify him as a target I'd trade back a few spots.  Looking at the talent available for the 4th round I don't think he'll be picked until at least mid round. We also need to look at free agent value vs draft value here too.  If we are not in love with any of these Center prospects, how do they compare to current free agents: C Connor Williams Mason Cole Brian Allen Lucas Patrick Connor McGovern Scott Quessenberry Nick Gates Edge Emmanuel Ogbah Yannick Ngakoue Carl Lawson Jerry Hughes Charles Harris Dawuane Smoot Bud Dupree Tyus Bowser Marquis Haynes Rasheem Green Markus Golden Shaq Lawson LB: Deion Jones Zach Cunningham CB  Xavien Howard Adoree’ Jackson Stephon Gilmore Steven Nelson Patrick Peterson J.C. Jackson Ahkello Witherspoon Keion Crossen Tre Herndon Eli Apple Chandon Sullivan Fabian Moreau Jerry Jacobs WR (fits our needs) Hunter Renfrow Michael Gallup Scotty Miller I would look to bring Gilmore, Deion Jones, and Haynes back.  Looking at the center market, we could get experienced depth out of that group via free agency.  I wouldn't force a prospect unless we know he fits the scheme.  Additionally, if we are looking to start Corbet, does that mean we can't rule out a guard or tackle that we could convert to a center over the course of the season?  Most linemen are trained, at some level, to play all 5 positions. We have three picks over the next 100 selections.  If we don't value the BPA at 101 over everyone else from the list below, I would take just about any three or more of these 25 guys listed below.   Top Targets day 3: Franklin WR Tampa CB Booker Edge Javon Baker WR Carson CB Erick All TE Dolrus Edge Brenden Rice WR Cam Hart CB Jackson CB Stover TE MacLachlan TE Brenner Jackson Edge Wilely TE Cedric Johnson Edge Mohamed Kamara Edge Hunter Nourzad C AJ Barner TE Christian Mahogany G/C Gabriel Murphy Edge Jordan Jefferson DT/NT Javontae Jean-Batiste EDGE Tommy Eichenberg LB Eric Watts DE/DT Braiden McGregor EDGE
×
×
  • Create New...