Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The deep-ish ball to DJ moore that drew PI….

electro's horse

By electro's horse,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pejorative Miscreant Grand Master

Pejorative Miscreant

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Here are talking heads arguing about the same thing as here....  

 

Guy at the end said it best. Cam doesn’t need to be elite. He needs to be effective.  Panthers as an offense haven’t been effective for a while now. This gives them the opportunity to reach that.  
 

agree we need a long term QB answer but we didn’t have a long term solution at QB in September either.  What we have is the best opportunity to win now. Whether that come to fruition or not will play out. Kudos to Cam and the FO for coming together mid season and creating the chance to do so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Snake said:

His timing was jacked all game. Hence why he wasn't used very much. He might have to run with the 2s for a couple of weeks just to get back in rhythm. PJ was just as important for the win as Cam was simply because of that. He was super accurate with his throws most of the game. 

I know this will not happen because the NFL doesn't work this way but it would be nice to see PJ and Cam both play for periods in all of the remaining games.

Edited by KatsAzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

The ball did reach DJ's hands. He was mugged so he didn't haul it in obv. But for a 32 year old qb that has been with the team less than a full week he got us closer than the previous 24 year old qb who sailed balls over receivers heads or out of bounds consistently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cardiackat88. Mentor

cardiackat88.

Posted
Posted

Maybe it was the timing, maybe it was Cam not having the cannon he used to, but I also think there was a different factor.

If a DB is getting super handsy or holding a lot but not getting the call for it, a pass is sometimes lobbed in their direction to exploit it. The catch isn’t really catchable, but it draws the PI and the ball is placed at the spot of the foul. I see this a whole lot in Play-off games.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...