Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deangelo Williams and Gary Barnidge on Cam and yesterday's game

PanthersATL

By PanthersATL,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Dex said:

I honestly didn't think Gary B would be such a hater. Enjoy your legacy of irrelevancy.

He was wrong that CMC deserved the credit? That PJ played well? 

I wasn't 💯 in agreement, but he was right that nobody is giving credit to those who actually won the game. 

This fan base is 💯 insane with Cam Newton.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
Just now, pantherclaw said:

He was wrong that CMC deserved the credit? That PJ played well? 

I wasn't 💯 in agreement, but he was right that nobody is giving credit to those who actually won the game. 

This fan base is 💯 insane with Cam Newton.

Yep. Some of what they say is right and objective but people will get butthurt. I felt like CMC had more impact than anyone. And they are 100% correct cam can do no wrong for…the ‘fanbase’. He’s back and that’s all that matters. Just reading the forum proves it.

I will disagree with this though, starting PJ over Cam is straight asinine. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

He was wrong that CMC deserved the credit? That PJ played well? 

I wasn't 💯 in agreement, but he was right that nobody is giving credit to those who actually won the game. 

This fan base is 💯 insane with Cam Newton.

Hey do me a quick favor and tell me CMacs record with Cam versus Cmacs record without Cam.

thanks

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Yep. Some of what they say is right and objective but people will get butthurt. I felt like CMC had more impact than anyone. And they are 100% correct cam can do no wrong for…the ‘fanbase’. He’s back and that’s all that matters. Just reading the forum proves it.

I will disagree with this though, starting PJ over Cam is straight asinine. 

Yeah. Gotta start Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
95Panthers4Ever Enthusiast

95Panthers4Ever

Posted
Posted

First let me say I've been a Panthers fan since 1995 and never knew about this "huddle" just ran across it one night and now I read a lot of these topics everyday.....with that being said, I think it's safe to say that this fan base has a lot more hope and optimism with Cam vs with Sam and PJ all together. Personally I never liked the decision to make a trade for Sam he's simply not good imo

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mwright350 Rising Star

mwright350

Posted
Posted

The problem is Deangelo has run his bitter mouth to the point that he could be giving me elite level insightful analysis and I just don't want to hear it.  If a 'star™ ' tight end with one good season ever is such a beacon of grudge that he makes Deangelo look like the level headed one I'm just gonna go ahead and pass on their silly podcast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, 95Panthers4Ever said:

First let me say I've been a Panthers fan since 1995 and never knew about this "huddle" just ran across it one night and now I read a lot of these topics everyday.....with that being said, I think it's safe to say that this fan base has a lot more hope and optimism with Cam vs with Sam and PJ all together. Personally I never liked the decision to make a trade for Sam he's simply not good imo

Run now while you still can. Delete the bookmark. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      Who will blow it Sunday?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • kungfoodude
      Passer Rating Differential: A Key to predicting a teams playoff and championship potential.

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • kungfoodude
      The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...