Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deangelo Williams and Gary Barnidge on Cam and yesterday's game

PanthersATL

By PanthersATL,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Dex said:

I honestly didn't think Gary B would be such a hater. Enjoy your legacy of irrelevancy.

He was wrong that CMC deserved the credit? That PJ played well? 

I wasn't 💯 in agreement, but he was right that nobody is giving credit to those who actually won the game. 

This fan base is 💯 insane with Cam Newton.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
Just now, pantherclaw said:

He was wrong that CMC deserved the credit? That PJ played well? 

I wasn't 💯 in agreement, but he was right that nobody is giving credit to those who actually won the game. 

This fan base is 💯 insane with Cam Newton.

Yep. Some of what they say is right and objective but people will get butthurt. I felt like CMC had more impact than anyone. And they are 100% correct cam can do no wrong for…the ‘fanbase’. He’s back and that’s all that matters. Just reading the forum proves it.

I will disagree with this though, starting PJ over Cam is straight asinine. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
therealmjl Grand Master

therealmjl

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

He was wrong that CMC deserved the credit? That PJ played well? 

I wasn't 💯 in agreement, but he was right that nobody is giving credit to those who actually won the game. 

This fan base is 💯 insane with Cam Newton.

Hey do me a quick favor and tell me CMacs record with Cam versus Cmacs record without Cam.

thanks

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Yep. Some of what they say is right and objective but people will get butthurt. I felt like CMC had more impact than anyone. And they are 100% correct cam can do no wrong for…the ‘fanbase’. He’s back and that’s all that matters. Just reading the forum proves it.

I will disagree with this though, starting PJ over Cam is straight asinine. 

Yeah. Gotta start Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
95Panthers4Ever Enthusiast

95Panthers4Ever

Posted
Posted

First let me say I've been a Panthers fan since 1995 and never knew about this "huddle" just ran across it one night and now I read a lot of these topics everyday.....with that being said, I think it's safe to say that this fan base has a lot more hope and optimism with Cam vs with Sam and PJ all together. Personally I never liked the decision to make a trade for Sam he's simply not good imo

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mwright350 Rising Star

mwright350

Posted
Posted

The problem is Deangelo has run his bitter mouth to the point that he could be giving me elite level insightful analysis and I just don't want to hear it.  If a 'star™ ' tight end with one good season ever is such a beacon of grudge that he makes Deangelo look like the level headed one I'm just gonna go ahead and pass on their silly podcast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, 95Panthers4Ever said:

First let me say I've been a Panthers fan since 1995 and never knew about this "huddle" just ran across it one night and now I read a lot of these topics everyday.....with that being said, I think it's safe to say that this fan base has a lot more hope and optimism with Cam vs with Sam and PJ all together. Personally I never liked the decision to make a trade for Sam he's simply not good imo

Run now while you still can. Delete the bookmark. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...