Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Old friend Jack Del Rio talking about qb situation this Sunday

BurnNChinn

By BurnNChinn,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, CanadianCat said:

Im torn.

PJ might be better at running the system today. So he might give uis the best/safest chance to win THIS week. 

But we need to get Cam up to speed ASAP and playing is the fastest way to do that. 

So the question is how many games could we afford to potentially drop to do that? 

None especially next 3. 

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

What y’all think?

I think Del Rio is correct.   And it isn't even two weeks for Cam.  I think Cam starts and does the Cam scripted opening drive.  Then I think we insert the Cam package into redzone and certain short yardage plays. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

Im torn.

PJ might be better at running the system today. So he might give uis the best/safest chance to win THIS week. 

But we need to get Cam up to speed ASAP and playing is the fastest way to do that. 

So the question is how many games could we afford to potentially drop to do that? 

To make a playoff run, we need to win the next 3 games. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Oh look another “Cam can’t learn a playbook” criticism. Hmmmm

I don't think Del Rio is a Cam hater looking to throw shade. 

I think he has been around the NFL and long time and knows only 8 full days with a new playbook and langauge would leave a QB in a very neutered position for 4 quarters. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GRWatcher Mentor

GRWatcher

Posted
Posted

I really liked Del Rio when he was with us. And still do. I wish he hadn't left although a head coaching job would be hard to turn down. He's trying to stay neutral with what he's saying but it's obvious he doesn't know Cam at all. Guess he didn't see the film with Cam's remark to Clay Matthews about watching film.

He just gave Cam the biggest incentive even if Cam says, nah. You can take that to the bank.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Leave our mark.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • frankw
      Delete this franchise

      By frankw · Posted

      It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • PanthersNCSU
      Delete this franchise

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...