Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Phil Snow’s defense isn’t equipped to defend the power run game


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Teams that have stout O-lines annihilate us. As good as Reddick/Burns are, against mauling OTs they become pedestrian.

 

I know they like to use YGM and Fox to defend the run but it’s just not there. In the past this team had road grading LBs (Davis) to defend the run but guys like Carter just get eviscerated 

while we are all quick to praise Snow, his inability to game plan for WAS was pretty sad. You knew they only had McClaurin and Gibson but you just let that team own the time of possession and have their way

  • Pie 6
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just listed what he had to work with for this match-up but expected it to go any differently?  News flash, we struggle against good running teams with big offensive linemen. We are built for speed but are light in the ass for power. Our ends are just not good against the run and the tackles can only do so much.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea you can't have Reddick and Burns both on the field at the same time as your base package. Burns especially gets ate up in the run and thats exactly where they attack in the power run game. They don't even bother testing the middle when they just know for a fact they can move Burns up and off the ball.

Have to have that as your pass rush but we need a DE on that side who can stop the run first but be a threat as a pass rusher. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Again let's not be prioners of the moment.. With no offensive help for Atleast 6 or 7 weeks this defense has only been beat up like this 3x this year... Let's not throw out the baby with the bath water ..

Not every team is a power run team so this makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Not every team is a power run team so this makes no sense.

Okay so still my point stands.. 

Reality check.. Not to many teams have done that to this defense and if only a few teams can.. Then what's wrong with that idea.. And Also even with this they barley loss to all those team except the Cowboys..

Do you see the reasoning in that??

Edited by WOW!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the D is constructed puts a lot of pressure on the interior line against the power run. For all his off field issues a thumper like Perryman would have been a huge help to alleviate some of that. That being said, Carter is not fast, explosive, or instinctive enough to be undersized and has no business being out there over someone like Luvu on rushing downs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...