Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

John Matsko


slumdogmillionaire
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah our talent is lacking on the offensive line but our coaching of the line is horrible.  Al Wallace on WFNZ didn’t want to blast our current coaches but he heavily hinted that if Moton is playing bad it may not be all the players.   Matsko has the Skins line looking good again even without elite players.  He doesn’t have Trent Williams and let go of Moses Moody and a couple others but was able to get Charles Leno after getting cut from Bears.  How were the Panthers not all over that in a clear cap issue move by Bears?

Slater on this team or drafting a bunch of others won’t matter if our coaching stinks.   We need Fitterer or someone other than Rhule to make coaching hires.   We miss John Matsko.

Edited by slumdogmillionaire
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WFT guards and tackles are ranked in the top 5 at their positions… both guards are top 5. It isn’t just coaching…. The talent is there 

 

I did a write up on them last week with sources and stats to support their level of talent. WFT has the best run line in the nfl and top 5 passing

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's because Joe Brady isn't an O-line or RBs coach, just a WR coach only by position. He knows nothing about about the trenches, but our WRs aren't producing either, which suggests he has poor knowledge about any part of the offense. An offensive coordinator needs to have an O-line scheme to not only run block, but to pass protect, with a million assignments for each position, for different defensive looks. Brady's offensive plan looks like, " it's either this way or no way". Which we seem to be going to nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talent and coaching is an issue here. They can't find it and they wouldn't know what to do with it anyways.

Also, expecting Fritts to bring in good olinen is hilarious. That dude is 0-4 last offseason at this point.

Nothing is going to change with this crew, they are all awful.

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

WFT guards and tackles are ranked in the top 5 at their positions… both guards are top 5. It isn’t just coaching…. The talent is there 

 

I did a write up on them last week with sources and stats to support their level of talent. WFT has the best run line in the nfl and top 5 passing

Yeah but also good coaching. Rivera/Hurney left this team depleted but imo coaching hasn't helped. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Washington is also on their 5th center of the season and their line looks worlds better. 

Exactly. Our front office decisions especially with the oline have hurt us but there's no excuse to be all time levels of bad that's on coaching too. It's all been 🗑

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personal Opinion: A big part (maybe the biggest part) of our protection problem lies with Rhule's concept of how to build an offensive line.

The primary trait Rhule wants in an offensive lineman is versatility, the ability to play more than one position so that the line can be shuffled if needed. And when we went looking for linemen in free agency and the draft, that's what we were trying to find.

Mind you, versatility is a marvelous thing to have in a backup, but your starters should be guys that can lock down one spot and anchor there. Outside of Taylor Moton, I'm not sure we have anybody who fits that description.

As it stands now, almost the whole line is made up of guys who bear the title "jack of all trades, master of none".

And the results speak for themselves...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, slumdogmillionaire said:

Yeah our talent is lacking on the offensive line but our coaching of the line is horrible.  Al Wallace on WFNZ didn’t want to blast our current coaches but he heavily hinted that if Moton is playing bad it may not be all the players.   Matsko has the Skins line looking good again even without elite players.  He doesn’t have Trent Williams and let go of Moses Moody and a couple others but was able to get Charles Leno after getting cut from Bears.  How were the Panthers not all over that in a clear cap issue move by Bears?

Slater on this team or drafting a bunch of others won’t matter if our coaching stinks.   We need Fitterer or someone other than Rhule to make coaching hires.   We miss John Matsko.

nobody and i mean NOBODY misses john matsko. we were having these same discussions with him here. it must be the fact that these players hate charlotte, the owner sucks, or the turf is that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...