Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Brady’s Future

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

What plays do you want him to call? And when the plays are there the QB is missing the throw, the o-line is not giving enough time for the play to develop and the personal in general is terrible.

 

How many times last season and this season did Teddy and Darnold miss wide open guys, what is Brady supposed to do?

 

 Rhule wants this physical run heavy team, why hire Brady in the first place? Brady whole MO is pass first

Oh I don't know, so much of the playbook went out the window when or biggest catching TE left in a trade. I would love to see some more 21 personnel, hell even some pass plays out of 13 personnel. We need more than just 11 personnel. Give the appearance of a short play on a 2 and 4, and run some play action pass. The o-line protection calls are a huge issue and none of our WR's can beat the CB off the line. So I guess we will continue to see green dogs and jam until we beat it.

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted

Honestly, I hope he gets back on with a college team and has great success. The guy's biggest fault was that he just wasn't ready. He caught lightning in a bottle once and then found out that it's hard to do twice. The rest is going to require hard work and a lot of lessons learned. 

We'll see him again in the NFL. He'll be better the next time if he gets some more experience under his belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
travisura Grand Master

travisura

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, hepcat said:

If Brady goes to a top college he will need to bring an experienced DC along with him probably with head coaching experience. 

The teams that have supposedly contacted him could be lower level teams within the power 5 conferences. And that's assuming that this rumor has merit to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...