Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro Football Talk on Matt Rhule


Toker Smurf
 Share

Recommended Posts

Tepper is not going to fire him this season we might as well quit talking about it. He won’t give up after two seasons because it will be like two wasted seasons when he said this is a 3-5 year process. I want him gone but anyone thinking Tepper has those brass balls are wrong. He doesn’t have the balls to fire him before he gets to year 3!

Edited by BurnNChinn
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Tepper is not going to fire him this season we might as well quit talking about it. He won’t give up after two seasons because it will be like two wasted seasons when he said this is a 3-5 year process. I want him gone but anyone thinking Tepper has those brass balls are wrong. He doesn’t have the balls to fire him before he gets to year 3!

It’s a 3-5 year process assuming you’re seeing progression not regression week after week.  He needs to fire him and move on

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the whole "he wasn't available Saturday" thing is bizarre. All this time through the offensive struggles I assumed Rhule had to be in Joe's ear on the regular. But this is an example of what people have been talking about with lack of both accountability and clear vision.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jayflip said:

Firing Rhule doesn’t necessarily reset the 3-5 year rebuild. We built up the D, we have (on paper) the right skill position players on O. Just need an oline and QB.
 

Heck, a new coach could potentially expedite the 3-5 years from this point if they can use this young roster to its strengths while rebuilding the oline

NFL rebuilds don’t take 3-5 years. By year 3 we should be in the playoffs. In year two we should constantly be in the hunt or a fringe playoff team, despite our record we are not. 
5 year rebuild is college speak where coaches get a lot more leeway. 
NFL fans don’t have the patience for a 5 year rebuild. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NAS said:

It’s a 3-5 year process assuming you’re seeing progression not regression week after week.  He needs to fire him and move on

Hey I’m with you no doubt but Tepper is trying to prove he is right about something and so far he has been wrong about everything as an owner. So he will give Rhule a pass since he let Brady go. I don’t like it but that’s what will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

sunk cost fallacy

If Rhule doesn't have it, which he clearly doesn't look to have it at all.....there is no point wasting more time with him.   

Parting with a HC after two years isn't some crazy and ballsy move in the NFL.   That is actually pretty normal in the NFL when a team gets stuck with someone he clearly isn't going to work. 

I looked it up and apparently the average tenure for an NFL coach is 3 years. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Hey I’m with you no doubt but Tepper is trying to prove he is right about something and so far he has been wrong about everything as an owner. So he will give Rhule a pass since he let Brady go. I don’t like it but that’s what will happen.

If this teams loses down the stretch and goes 5-12 or even 6-11 and Tepper doesn't fire Rhule Tepper is an idiot. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Tepper is not going to fire him this season we might as well quit talking about it. He won’t give up after two seasons because it will be like two wasted seasons when he said this is a 3-5 year process. I want him gone but anyone thinking Tepper has those brass balls are wrong. He doesn’t have the balls to fire him before he gets to year 3!

Dude you have no clue what a billionaire and NFL owner is going to do. 

  • Pie 4
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

If this teams loses down the stretch and goes 5-12 or even 6-11 and Tepper doesn't fire Rhule Tepper is an idiot. 

Yes. A complete shitshow on the offensive side of the ball and we have players like Terrance Marshall not even getting a jersey on Sundays. I think we can win Sunday and I think we might have a chance playing against TB at the end of the year because they will be resting people. I’ll also not be surprised if we go 0-5 to end the year. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...