Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's talk coaches

PanthersATL

By PanthersATL,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mother Grabber said:

Rhule is not like Fox and Rivera. their faults ram along being uncreative, too conservative, and making decisions out of fear.

whatever you think of rhule, he’s shown he’s not afraid to make a move, be it with the roster or on the field.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
On 12/12/2021 at 11:36 PM, Cdparr7 said:

Hackett, Eberflus, Daboll

 

On 12/12/2021 at 11:45 PM, Shocker said:

If we make a move Nathaniel Hackett should definitely be a front runner

 

On 12/12/2021 at 11:49 PM, Mr. Scot said:

I'd call Daboll the most likely candidate, but to me Hackett is far and away the best candidate.

 

On 12/13/2021 at 12:06 AM, Mr. Scot said:

Hackett and his dad have connections going all the way back to Bill Walsh. He basically grew up around the NFL.

Click on the thread by Ricky Spanish that he linked above and you'll see plenty of info.

 

On 12/13/2021 at 9:11 AM, Mr. Scot said:

Nah, I think Hackett's gonna be really good.

Everywhere he's been, the offense has improved greatly.

You could actually get that same OC/DC combo under Nathaniel Hackett.

Pettine was the Packers DC not that long ago and Hamilton worked with Hackett's dad.

Mind you, I prefer Jim Schwartz or Gus Bradley as DC options. There are other good possibilities at OC as well.

Scot, dang bro....you were full on hackett.

Soooo much changed in less than a year......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Scot, dang bro....you were full on hackett.

Soooo much changed in less than a year......

Yep, largely because of how I thought he'd handle things, especially staffing. But instead he went in the opposite direction of pretty much everything I expected him to do.

With the connections he had between himself and his dad, he could've built a world class staff, but he chose to go with a load of inexperienced or underexperienced options. Then to top it all off, rather than drafting a young signal caller he and Paton blew a huge wad on Wilson.

In essence, Hackett wound up being the head coaching version of David Tepper.

It's a reminder that coaching hires, just like quarterback draft picks, are unpredictable.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yep, largely because of how I thought he'd handle things, especially staffing. But instead he went in the opposite direction of pretty much everything I expected him to do.

With the connections he had between himself and his dad, he could've built a world class staff, but he chose to go with a load of inexperienced or underexperienced options. Then to top it all off, rather than drafting a young signal caller he and Paton blew a huge wad on Wilson.

In essence, Hackett wound up being the head coaching version of David Tepper.

It's a reminder that coaching hires, just like quarterback draft picks, are unpredictable.

No one can predict the future. nasa can in some ways tho...

Now you dont even want him as a OC either? 

Just like the baker deal here, it just didnt work out and ended with crashing burning fashion....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Basbear said:

No one can predict the future. nasa can in some ways tho...

Now you dont even want him as a OC either? 

Just like the baker deal here, it just didnt work out and ended with crashing burning fashion....

I'd say his best option is to go back to being a position coach and work his way back up.

From what I've been reading though, sounds like he'll be heading back to Green Bay in some capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Panthera onca
      Nice to win, but Tim Weaver of SI has key duds among the studs

      By Panthera onca · Posted

      It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • TheSpecialJuan
      The Dowdle Mirage - Play Calling Problems

      By TheSpecialJuan · Posted

      We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • tukafan21
      The Dowdle Mirage - Play Calling Problems

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...