Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At the very least Rhule should lose personel decisions.

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

They did and only the bears made an offer.  Trading back in the first is not as easy as just saying you are going to trade back.  It will/should take a kings ransom to move off of a top 10 pick. 

 

How would picking slater been a reach?  He is an all pro right now.  He has started from day 1.  There was never going to be an adjustment period for him.  He was always a plug and play left tackle.  Rhule and his dumb ass arm length fuged that up tremendously.   I never understand the BPA strategy or calling picks a reach etc.  If you scouted the player, if that position is a need and said player comes in and is productive how the fug is that a "reach".  Trust your scouting process. 

The reason we didn't bite on the Bears offer is because the team was stuck on a CB and was worried both of the guys they were targeting would be gone.  Surtain went the very next pick. That part, they correct on. 

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Chosen Newton said:

Why is everyone acting like the defense is not the problem..we got big ticket cj Henderson and stephon Gilmore and yet we're still giving up 28 points to ATL without calvin Ridley. Phil snow should have been let go with joe brady, this defense can't get a stop for their life. 

....said they really havent made a stop when it mattered since the 3rd qrt of the jets game....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, AndrewLaskoski said:

Coming into the week, the Panthers were 6th in points allowed at 19.8 points per game. 

The defense is obviously flawed but it’s been good so far this season

I’ll ask the question again 

when did they stop a game winning drive this season. 

I dont care about points allowed.  

Did they stop WFT.  the Giants , the Cowboys, the Falcons, the Vikings, the Eagles the list goes on and you can soon add to it the bills. Bucs and Saints. The Saints won’t be missing  6 coache’s and 5 players this time  

if they had played  the cardinals with Murray and Hopkins, they would have torn Snows defense to pieces

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AndrewLaskoski Enthusiast

AndrewLaskoski

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I’ll ask the question again 

when did they stop a game winning drive this season. 

I dont care about points allowed.  

Did they stop WFT.  the Giants , the Cowboys, the Falcons, the Vikings, the Eagles the list goes on and you can soon add to it the bills. Bucs and Saints. The Saints won’t be missing  6 coache’s and 5 players this time  

if they had played  the cardinals with Murray and Hopkins, they would have torn Snows defense to pieces

Stephon Gilmore intercepted the ball with 1:53 left against the Falcons when they were driving and sealed the game. So the answer to your question is week 8.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/game/_/gameId/401326437

Every team has injuries/issues so you can't hold the oppositions injuries against the Panthers. Would the Panthers have won the Vikings/Eagles games with a healthy CMC? Probably but those teams don't care, they got the W. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

Just look at the comments that are starting to be made by our players. There's no covering it up now. There's zero accountability within this organization right now and zero leadership. Rhule has to go. Best of luck to the next guy trying to clean up this colossal mess he's made. Damn Tepper... you blew the fug out of that call.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Zod said:

He has basically been coach/gm in terms of talent acquisition.

 

It's obvious he sucks at it and that is a huge reason for the mess we are in.

 

If you aren't going to fire Rhule, then at least hand off all personel decisions to Fitterer and Morgan. 

You know, with the way that the roster is currently structured in that this team is basically what we're looking at next year with few resources to do much tinkering with, it almost feels like we have to just ride with the poo show next season so that when 2023 starts the team will have draft capital + plenty of cap space to work with.

This is as close to a Houston situation as we can be sans the Deshaun Watson fiasco. Unless the new coaching staff is getting to treat next season like "year 0" with expectations to simply be "don't regress" in the following season... idk... this just doesn't seem like an attractive head coaching destination currently. Granted, there's only 32 of those spots so they're attractive regardless, but this is ass.

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NanuqoftheNorth Grand Master

NanuqoftheNorth

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Icege said:

You know, with the way that the roster is currently structured in that this team is basically what we're looking at next year with few resources to do much tinkering with, it almost feels like we have to just ride with the poo show next season so that when 2023 starts the team will have draft capital + plenty of cap space to work with.

This is as close to a Houston situation as we can be sans the Deshaun Watson fiasco. Unless the new coaching staff is getting to treat next season like "year 0" with expectations to simply be "don't regress" in the following season... idk... this just doesn't seem like an attractive head coaching destination currently. Granted, there's only 32 of those spots so they're attractive regardless, but this is ass.

I've gotta believe there is already a lot here for a new coaching staff to work with.  Bring in/draft a couple of competent linemen and an average or better QB and this team is at least competitive enough to be entertaining. 

That should give most fans hope for the future.  In 2023, the second year of the new coaching staff, they could make some serious changes as needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Chosen Newton said:

Why is everyone acting like the defense is not the problem..we got big ticket cj Henderson and stephon Gilmore and yet we're still giving up 28 points to ATL without calvin Ridley. Phil snow should have been let go with joe brady, this defense can't get a stop for their life. 

They’re playing patty cake out there.  No fire, getting blown off the los and I saw an Olineman blocking a safety 15 yards down field.  We have 4/3 DTs and 3/4 linebackers.  Complete with stand up edge rushers that can’t set the edge in the run game.

Defense is a top dollar poo show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...