Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At Least we dont have nagy....


DeeJay
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Maybe they do, maybe they don't.  Probably won't know for at least two more seasons.  Right now, all they know is he turns the ball over a lot.

poo dude he looked pretty good last night, he needs to clean up the to's but I love his ability to run, throw on the run and be pinpoint accurate when he has time.  I would be super thrilled if I was a bears fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

poo dude he looked pretty good last night, he needs to clean up the to's but I love his ability to run, throw on the run and be pinpoint accurate when he has time.  I would be super thrilled if I was a bears fan

You’d be terrified if you were a Bears fan and fields put up that kind of first year. One of the worst starts ever for a NFL QB ratings wise. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

You’d be terrified if you were a Bears fan and fields put up that kind of first year. One of the worst starts ever for a NFL QB ratings wise. 

No I would realize that he’s a rookie and works with a poo coach that doesn’t design the offense to his strengths. Even with all of that being said, He’s certainly been better than Zach Wilson, and at least on par with Trevor Lawrence so I don’t understand the hyperbole mountaintop that you’re shouting down from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, stbugs said:

What a moron. Did Nagy watch how San Diego lost going for it on every 4th down? Chicago loses by 8 (7 really if they needed an XP) and decides to go for it 3 times. So, instead of having a 36, 31 and 26 yard FG attempts and being down by 5, they are down 14 and the last second TD just makes the score look not so bad instead of say, winning the game. Two games where the coaches were a combined 0-7 on 4th down and win if they just kick FGs.

Who is San Diego?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

No I would realize that he’s a rookie and works with a poo coach that doesn’t design the offense to his strengths. Even with all of that being said, He’s certainly been better than Zach Wilson, and at least on par with Trevor Lawrence so I don’t understand the hyperbole mountaintop that you’re shouting down from.

If you had that kind of patience, Trubisky would still be your QB and you’d likely be in the playoffs this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

No I would realize that he’s a rookie and works with a poo coach that doesn’t design the offense to his strengths. Even with all of that being said, He’s certainly been better than Zach Wilson, and at least on par with Trevor Lawrence so I don’t understand the hyperbole mountaintop that you’re shouting down from.

These takes about mobile QB's are all from the same playbook. They'll drag him for his completion percentage even though he's been a rookie learning on the fly but this same board made excuse after excuse for third year QB Darnold who has one of the league worst QBR and passer rating amongst starting quarterbacks. To have a young rookie with promise waiting would be a major boost for this franchise heading into next season but people who ridicule others for talking about it are just projecting. They know. They just can't admit it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

poo dude he looked pretty good last night, he needs to clean up the to's but I love his ability to run, throw on the run and be pinpoint accurate when he has time.  I would be super thrilled if I was a bears fan

If I had a dollar for every time I have heard similar words about an NFL quarterback, I would probably be a rich man.  Just about any NFL level quarterback can look good for a short time.  Sam Darnold looked good for a short time.  Even in Darnold's first season with the Jets, there were times people would say, if he can just clean up the turnovers, he is going to be great.  A few do clean it up, most do not.  If he can get to the point were he can look good consistently, and bad games become a rare thing, then he is a franchise qb.  Until that time though, he is just another guy with potential.  That is also true for Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, and Mack Jones.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...