Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At Least we dont have nagy....


DeeJay
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

While you’re laughing, go look up Nagy’s record in Chicago with Trubisky at QB vs any other QB (including Fields). 

Win-loss records are not a QB statistic. If they were then maybe your boy would have gotten a starting job this off-season, or would have had his 5th year option picked up.

Edited by X-Clown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Martin said:

This years super hyped rookie QB class has been very underwhelming in the games I’ve seen. There are a few wow throws in there, but overall meh. 

That’s just how it is. Rookie QBs historically look bad some don’t even play and ride bench year 1. Recently for example…Allen, Murray, Mahomes, even Rodgers sat forever…Burrow and Jackson were underwhelming year one, everyone expects a Wilson like entrance that happens like once every 3-4 years.

It’s VERY VERY rare a rookie comes in a right away and lights it up. Especially because most go to poo teams. That means a lot, it’s no coincidence the rookie qb doing the best, also went last of the top 5 qbs, to the better team than any of them.

At least one if not two, maybe three  of the top four qbs other than Mac (who will probably always be good, not great in the future) are going to turn out good to great.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, X-Clown said:

Win-loss records are not a QB statistic. If they were then maybe your boy would have gotten a starting job this off-season, or would have had his 5th year option picked up.

Difficult for Trubisky to do either when he’s the scapegoat for the coach/fans. All Nagy needed was his QB, they said. Foles came and proved worse than Mitch. Well then the narrative switched bc they have a ‘young franchise QB’ that will carry the team to success. Womp womp. He turned in a first year also worse than Trubisky. Maybe, just maybe, it’s Nagy’s terrible system combined with a bottom of the league skill position group. 
 

Lets see what opportunities he gets this off-season. Whether you want to admit it or not, we would be a better team this year with Mitch than any of the QBs on our roster. It also wouldn’t have cost as much as we spent for terrible QB play. A long-term, high-end QB2 contract would have likely done it. Look where we are now and look at the Bears. Both suck and would’ve have been better off with Mitch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

Difficult for Trubisky to do either when he’s the scapegoat for the coach/fans. All Nagy needed was his QB, they said. Foles came and proved worse than Mitch. Well then the narrative switched bc they have a ‘young franchise QB’ that will carry the team to success. Womp womp. He turned in a first year also worse than Trubisky. Maybe, just maybe, it’s Nagy’s terrible system combined with a bottom of the league skill position group. 
 

Lets see what opportunities he gets this off-season. Whether you want to admit it or not, we would be a better team this year with Mitch than any of the QBs on our roster. It also wouldn’t have cost as much as we spent for terrible QB play. A long-term, high-end QB2 contract would have likely done it. Look where we are now and look at the Bears. Both suck and would’ve have been better off with Mitch. 

Foles was a fraud too, but can you honestly say without UNC homer glasses on that Mitchell's play deserved a 24.8 million dollar 5th year option and/or a major contract extension? 

 

My first post in the thread said that yes, Nagy's system sucks. But you're at the same time saying that Fields supposively sucks because his stats aren't good and they aren't winning? I also see little to no difference in how both QBs performed in their rookie year, not sure why you're categorizing that one was so much better than the other. If the expectation was that Fields was going to come in on day one an immediately elevate the team to a super bowl contender, that's just ridiculous. It was Nagy after all who signed Andy Dalton in the offseason and lauded Andy as his starter when healthy until it was clear that was a terrible idea. And yes, the Bears are better off paying Fields who has more upside and is on a rookie deal than Trubisky at 25 million plus.

Mitchell is better than Darnold and Walker I will concede that, although it isn't saying much. But I can't imagine that he would fare much better in Matt Rhule's poo system either.

Edited by X-Clown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two seasons ago, Nagy was honored at Wrigley Field by singing Take me out to the ball game at the 7th inning stretch. 
 

everyone knows how this song goes, he subtly said “penis” instead of “peanuts” and cracker jacks. You can find this video and watch it for yourself. 
 

this was a huge red flag - it shows immaturity, a lack of respect, and it just isn’t funny. Big surprise he is about to be fired for being a loser. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2021 at 11:32 AM, stbugs said:

All of them have potential that our QBs do not.

Potential is limited by the playbook.

Nick Foles won a Super Bowl over the Tom Brady Patriots.

Trubisky went to the post season with the Bears.

Fields is supposed to be a franchise QB.

None of those 3 facts look further from reality right now. And Matt Rhule is far worse than Nagy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/20/2021 at 10:42 PM, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

Rhule and Nagy both suck. At least they have a young franchise QB

Just Fields and Sam Darnold are the same age, or close to it, I believe. 

Sam would've been fine if the Panthers had resolved our OL issues. Instead we brought Darnold onto a team where our offensive line is worse than the Jets. What's that thing about the definition of insanity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPcavedweller said:

Just Fields and Sam Darnold are the same age, or close to it, I believe. 

Sam would've been fine if the Panthers had resolved our OL issues. Instead we brought Darnold onto a team where our offensive line is worse than the Jets. What's that thing about the definition of insanity?

Fields is two years younger. Born on March 5, 1999.
Darnold was born on June 5, 1997. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 4Corners said:

Two seasons ago, Nagy was honored at Wrigley Field by singing Take me out to the ball game at the 7th inning stretch. 
 

everyone knows how this song goes, he subtly said “penis” instead of “peanuts” and cracker jacks. You can find this video and watch it for yourself. 
 

this was a huge red flag - it shows immaturity, a lack of respect, and it just isn’t funny. Big surprise he is about to be fired for being a loser. 

poo GIF

Edited by PanthersGOATFan336
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...