Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who to draft....


musicman
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Panther53521 said:

What I prefer our OL looks like next year.

Cross

Christenburg

old probowl FA

Brown

Moton

draft a young center, but plan to replace the Vet C in 2 years

I like it.  Here is another one. 

Free agent - LT  Leno Jr, look him up. 

LG Ikem

OC rookie like Jarrett Patterson

RG Brown or Rookie Josh Sills

RT Moton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, stbugs said:

I don’t like the FA suggestions. We aren’t competing in 2022 with no QB so stop the stop gaps that cost a bunch of cap and cancel out comp picks. Two other things, first, draft a top 5/6 LT and play him at G? Why? If he’s the LT of the future, plug him in and don’t worry about growing pins because Sam and PJ getting hit is meaningless. Second, Brown is way overrated in here. I wanted Smith over him and that was the right call. We haven’t seen Brown play against legit NFL players yet, heck even BC is untested. Sure, he played well against WFT but they were missing Young and Sweat so essentially he’s untested as well. I don’t mind if they are in the discussion but there’s really nothing concrete yet that BC and Brown can be average or above.

I definitely would like a rookie LT to pair with Moton and then let BC and Brown fight it out with the other 3-4 day 3 OL picks we make (hopefully). Maybe try out some FAs that don’t mess up any comp picks and fill in depth with Erving and Elflein. I’d also be a big fan of using 2023 day 2 picks to finish the OL.

This is the Matt Rhule Panthers. If we draft a top shelf LT, he's gonna play C or RG. Then we can grab an overdrafted and undersized RT in the 4th to play LG. Obviously Erving will be the LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Verge said:

There are three elite tackles in this class, and another elite interior guy in Linderbaum. If you don't believe in one of the QBs, you take one of them. Anything else is malpractice.

I like this logic, I just think you could possibly get OT3, C1, or possible a QB that you like by trading down.

Also who do you consider OT3? Ekwonu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

That’s my fear.  They overdraft a qb at 6 and we roll him out behind this line and then we are stuck.  

You don't draft a QB to win now.  If anything, it's the opposite, you sign a vet QB and draft a lineman to protect him.

Nobody expects you to win with a rookie QB.  The only way you save your job with a rookie is showing improvement over the season.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know the offer to Lloyd came out, but I never saw that anything was officially offered to May or Donovan. Not saying it didn’t happen, just curious what the source is.
    • I haven’t scouted them to say, because I am not GM and have no say. The Miami kid, but he will probably be gone. Freeling. Proctor is interesting. Like I said I haven’t really scouted but I would look closer at him because I have seen some claiming he has the quickness and feet even at his inflated size. So I would look closer at that.  My ideal outcome is one of the top guys who are probably not gonna fall, falls and we use 19 on him. Obviously, I guess. I am  not wanting to trade up or anything - not putting it like code red at all costs, but if we get a chance to get that covered I would for sure want to take it.  Also it looks like we might be able to drop down a few slots and find a future RT at decent value which I would also be fine with.  I think if someone fell that made 19 a hot pick, then I would want to trade out unless it was a top T.  I would probably want to get a run stopper for the DL if the tackle thing didn’t fall right. That is what I voted for here because I feel it is more likely that we don’t have things fall to fit my scenario. 
×
×
  • Create New...