Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could this team beat the 2001 or 2010 teams?


KillerKat
 Share

Which is worse?  

62 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is worse?

    • 2001 Panthers
      7
    • 2010 Panthers
      22
    • 2021 Panthers
      33


Recommended Posts

I don't think they could. The 2001 team was probably the best out of the bunch despite their record. They were competitive and were still in many of the games they played. The 2010 vs 2021 team might be close, but I think the 2010 would still win. This is the worst team I have ever seen with my own eyes. There is absolutely no competitiveness and no drive at all. No gameplan, nothing. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the coaching is better in the other two...

Also if they just lined up in the wildcat and ran on the 2021 team that'd be enough to win. Just run left and there you go.

And obviously this is about the 2010 team, the 2001 team is no question not even sure why its up there its obvious they'd stomp 2021

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the 2001 season, 2010season , the Jerry Richardson scandal and numerous other bad seasons and events.

In all that time, I'm not sure I've ever seen the Panthers fanbase as absolutely downright hostile to the team as they are now.

Matt Rhule is as despised a figure as just about any in Panthers history, and that contempt is reflecting on David Tepper and the team in general to a huge degree.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I watched the 2001 season, 2010season , the Jerry Richardson scandal and numerous other bad seasons and events.

In all that time, I'm not sure I've ever seen the Panthers fanbase as absolutely downright hostile to the team as they are now.

Matt Rhule is as despised a figure as just about any in Panthers history, and that contempt is reflecting on David Tepper and the team in general to a huge degree.

People are starving for a reason to cheer.  A moment of joy.  To escape the madness of reality a while.

Some people play music or create art.  Others read or run for office.  We chose football as that little vice.

This is the best example of what this is like as a fan I can come up with.
Imagine if every time you tried to drink a beer the owner of the bar kicked you in the nuts.

Congrats. You’re a Panthers fan.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I watched the 2001 season, 2010season , the Jerry Richardson scandal and numerous other bad seasons and events.

In all that time, I'm not sure I've ever seen the Panthers fanbase as absolutely downright hostile to the team as they are now.

Matt Rhule is as despised a figure as just about any in Panthers history, and that contempt is reflecting on David Tepper and the team in general to a huge degree.

It's something we all can agree on. I will also say with those other teams at least there was hope the next season. With all accounts pointing to Rhules return fans are down right disgusted. I don't even think Jerry Richardson would sit through this mess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...