Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Robby Anderson: “We don’t want no fake fans”


Panthers Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

The fans were showing their contempt for what has gone on with the QB situation. It's unfortunate that Darnold caught the brunt of it but in reality those boos were the fans letting this shitty staff know how ridiculous it has become. 

Keep in mind, it's ultimately Matt Rhule that even put Sam in that situation to get booed. He traded for the dude, he coddled the dude, he set him up to fail. You want to blame someone for the boos(which were deserved), blame Matt fuging Rhule.

I understand the frustration.   I understand boo'ing.   I dont understand boo'ing a player for coming into the game.  I think PJ is clearly the worst qb on the roster and I would never consider boo'ing him for coming into the game.   Especially when we know how hard they have worked and how dedicated all the qbs on our roster have been.   They just arent good enough.  If they were coming out like Robbie and saying it's ok to lose basically it would probably be a little bit different maybe.

Edited by Tr3ach
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

It’s a joke about Robby because the guy is an idiot.  Why do you always miss the point and try to make something out of nothing?

1.  Was it a joke?  Ok my bad.

2.  Are all heads of hair are in-bounds for joking -- or only certain ones?

Either way suits me...

image.jpeg.ed7e978fa49e452161ee8d166fbfe591.jpeg

image.jpeg.f9589722a3cac768e4c065452e1ffeeb.jpeg

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...