Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our tandem system can evolve...

lightsout

By lightsout,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

We all have our own thoughts feelings and opinions on having RBs split carries and having QBs split snaps in regular season games and they all have their merits (by which I mean the former is good and the latter is bad and if you think otherwise, you're wrong).

But what about we take it to the next level. Let's revolutionize the way teams function. Let's trailblaze and show the world of football what the game is to be in the future, today.

Two Head Coach System. You keep one that has a bunch of really shitty ideas, right? Let him have free range to come up with whatever. Then you have a good head coach and his role is to say "sit down and shut up" to the shitty coach.

This lets you have numerous ideas so you can determine how shitty the bad ideas are so you know to never do them.

 

See you boys in the future!

 

*This post brought to you by Miller Lite.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, lightsout said:

We all have our own thoughts feelings and opinions on having RBs split carries and having QBs split snaps in regular season games and they all have their merits (by which I mean the former is good and the latter is bad and if you think otherwise, you're wrong).

But what about we take it to the next level. Let's revolutionize the way teams function. Let's trailblaze and show the world of football what the game is to be in the future, today.

Two Head Coach System. You keep one that has a bunch of really shitty ideas, right? Let him have free range to come up with whatever. Then you have a good head coach and his role is to say "sit down and shut up" to the shitty coach.

This lets you have numerous ideas so you can determine how shitty the bad ideas are so you know to never do them.

 

See you boys in the future!

 

*This post brought to you by Miller Lite.

14 more beers and you won't remember this by morning. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wes21 Mentor

Wes21

Posted
Posted (edited)

Good laugh for New Years.  Thank you.

 

I do think there is merit in multiple playcallers, though.  The Patriots are said to have multiple gameplans built into the same game.  But they have the same playcallers for the switch.  Imagine switching the gameplan, but then having a playcaller who is optimized for the particular strategy that is being ran in that situation...that drive...that quarter or that half.

This has been brought to you by Sierra Nevada in a joint campaign with Wild Turkey.

Edited by Wes21
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, lightsout said:

We all have our own thoughts feelings and opinions on having RBs split carries and having QBs split snaps in regular season games and they all have their merits (by which I mean the former is good and the latter is bad and if you think otherwise, you're wrong).

But what about we take it to the next level. Let's revolutionize the way teams function. Let's trailblaze and show the world of football what the game is to be in the future, today.

Two Head Coach System. You keep one that has a bunch of really shitty ideas, right? Let him have free range to come up with whatever. Then you have a good head coach and his role is to say "sit down and shut up" to the shitty coach.

This lets you have numerous ideas so you can determine how shitty the bad ideas are so you know to never do them.

 

See you boys in the future!

 

*This post brought to you by Miller Lite.

Best part of the post.   lol

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheProcess Rising Star

TheProcess

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

Wait til he incorporates the 2-Sam system next year, when Sam Darnold starts and plays until he throws a pick, then Sam Howell comes in and plays until he throws a pick, then Darnold comes in until his second pick, then Howell comes in until his second pick. 

Then the fifth possession begins 

Then PJ comes in and throws a pick. Its just a game of duck (Sam) duck (Sam) Goose ( PJ) by Rhule. Thats his genius plan, we just can't see it

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Alejandro Avila: Are We Really About To Hand Offensive Rookie Of The Year To An 'Okay' Receiver?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Adam Thielen had 1000 yards with rookie Bryce. I guess he's using that as comparison. Just kidding. Calm down. 
    • kungfoodude
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      We definitely improved from 2024 to 2025, to me the results were less important than the roster in that regard. It's better. It's still a very bad roster but continuing to be better is the goal. The changes we are talking about at QB are about spending LESS resources. Not picking up Bryce's 5th is a big potential savings. Significantly better QB's have been had in recent years for half or less than what Bryce will get in 2026. To say nothing of an extension(the ridiculous subject of this thread) which would cripple roster building by saddling it with a bloated QB contract for an awful QB. The price for Bryce, I mean who is even making that argument anymore? I don't think you are seeing anyone in this thread discussing trading up to #1 for Mendoza.  We are talking about cheap backup and FA QB's and Day 2 and 3 draft guys. That is literally tied to the idea of roster building. IMPROVE at QB while you build the roster so that we can actually potentially attract a franchise QB or when you make that big move up(SF for Lance) that your roster is so good that the impact is largely negated.  After all, improving over Bryce is an extremely low bar to hit. Let's not assume that standing pat would have resulted in a sudden spurge in good decision making. Don't forget who was making all those roster calls at the time. Bryce or not, we would have fuged it up in some way because we had idiots at the helm. We may still yet. Also, it's easy to say we can't get in the habit of switching QB's like that but there are also plenty of situations where that flip was the correct decision. Richardson to Jones, Rosen to Murray, Fields to Williams, Lance to Purdy(technically some nuance to this), etc. There is no real danger of Bryce leaving and suddenly becoming an elite QB. We all do know this, no matter how big of a Bryce stan you may be. His ceiling is middling game manager. So there isn't some crazy risk of moving on.
    • Navy_football
      Someone's not gonna be happy

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Honestly. You can see it on the field. Bryce will literally skip a pass on the ground rather than throw a contested catch to XL. Especially when it's one where XL would have to fight back to the ball. Coker is actually really good at that. Coker lacks real NFL speed (not a small thing), but he maxes out in most other categories. 
×
×
  • Create New...