Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold can’t throw the ball past the line of scrimmage.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, hepcat said:

LOL @ people still defending Darnold. I guess he’s just had a bad offensive line for 4 seasons in the NFL. He’s definitely not the worst QB in the NFL throughout his career. Definitely not! It’s everything else!!!! Darnold is god.

To be fair, he could both have had among the worst OLs in the NFL his entire career and also be atrocious.  I mean, he's played for two dumpster fires of teams...

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have below average qbs and no dogs on the o line.  bad o line play is a snowball effect that ruins all players confidence and changes playcalling.  Anyone who thinks switching to a better qb alone is going to change anything are mistaken.  They will be injured and ruined too. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Call Me James said:

Sam Darnold isn't good. He doesn't score Touchdowns. He's not an NFL caliber QB and the trade set us back at least another year. 

You've been riding his dick all year. Hopefully he gives you some money for it. 

I've said multiple times for months hes not good enough.   It's interesting how saying anything at all negative about 2021 Cam makes you a Sam dick rider.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Call Me James said:

If you kept the same tone about both we wouldn't be here.

Find something better to do. 

I 100% have lol.  I've said from the start its impossible to fully expect any qb to play well with our oline situation and I've also said no qb on our roster is good enough to win the team games...  in not sure where this stupid argument comes from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...