Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold can’t throw the ball past the line of scrimmage.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, hepcat said:

LOL @ people still defending Darnold. I guess he’s just had a bad offensive line for 4 seasons in the NFL. He’s definitely not the worst QB in the NFL throughout his career. Definitely not! It’s everything else!!!! Darnold is god.

To be fair, he could both have had among the worst OLs in the NFL his entire career and also be atrocious.  I mean, he's played for two dumpster fires of teams...

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have below average qbs and no dogs on the o line.  bad o line play is a snowball effect that ruins all players confidence and changes playcalling.  Anyone who thinks switching to a better qb alone is going to change anything are mistaken.  They will be injured and ruined too. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Call Me James said:

Sam Darnold isn't good. He doesn't score Touchdowns. He's not an NFL caliber QB and the trade set us back at least another year. 

You've been riding his dick all year. Hopefully he gives you some money for it. 

I've said multiple times for months hes not good enough.   It's interesting how saying anything at all negative about 2021 Cam makes you a Sam dick rider.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Call Me James said:

If you kept the same tone about both we wouldn't be here.

Find something better to do. 

I 100% have lol.  I've said from the start its impossible to fully expect any qb to play well with our oline situation and I've also said no qb on our roster is good enough to win the team games...  in not sure where this stupid argument comes from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...