Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yeah, Shaq gives a damn.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let's get this out of the way first.  It's not a narrative that Shaq has been underperforming the contract he was given.  It's a fact.  He was paid like Bobby Wagner.  He's been "solid", yes, but not spectacular.  Shaq has nearly played up to his contract this year, and a better team might have led him to be even more effective.  Glad to see it.

Now, what has never been in doubt (that I've heard) is his mental fortitude.  He's right.  If you don't get pissed off at losing, we don't need you.  That sounds an awful lot like Cam.  Good.  We need that attitude.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been Shaq's best season.  He will never be Luke or TD, but he has grown and shows leadership.

The couple of games he was out we definitely missed him quite a bit.

I like what he said about if you don't want to play then you aren't needed.....speaks volumes about the locker room right now.  Some players have packed it in.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

This has been Shaq's best season.  He will never be Luke or TD, but he has grown and shows leadership.

The couple of games he was out we definitely missed him quite a bit.

I like what he said about if you don't want to play then you aren't needed.....speaks volumes about the locker room right now.  Some players have packed it in.

 

Yup... Rhule can't get players to play with passion anymore... But maybe his culture all along is a sort of acceptance and apathy of poor play, I dunno 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Weird how yesterday saying "we're not getting is done" was throwing people under the bus, but today it's "giving a damn" 🤔

In any case, it's obvious there are some cultural issues here.

People didn't listen to the clip at all and took a very small piece out of context. That clip was bookended by Sam saying he should have recognized a blitz and on the other end by him saying he isn't playing well enough to win games.

And the statement itself was a damn answer to a question about he and Cam suffering behind a bad OL. Cam was brought up in the question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mav1234 said:

People didn't listen to the clip at all and took a very small piece out of context. That clip was bookended by Sam saying he should have recognized a blitz and on the other end by him saying he isn't playing well enough to win games.

And the statement itself was a damn answer to a question about he and Cam suffering behind a bad OL. Cam was brought up in the question...

I know. Just pointing out how things work sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...