Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

After thinking about it, if I were Tepper I would probably keep Rhule


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Tepper is keeping Rhule so he doesn't have to admit he f*cked up.

This may be the case, but the other part of his ego that wants so badly to win and make the playoffs is hopefully going to win out.

Rhule screwed up the draft last year by not picking Parsons or Slater,(whom I rooted for to pick)and both ruled in their rookie season. It was obvious this was going to happen, so how do football guys miss the obvious?  Because they aren't very good! Both he and Fitts need to be fired Monday morning! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what FA would want to sign with us? (We already have all the Baylor-Temple players in the league.) Why would DJ Moore, or any of our future players with contracts coming up want to resign with us? Cut your losses ASAP. If you don't.... expect a trade for Jimmy G, us moving all our draft picks and extending every Baylor player and coach. 

Edited by Jared Patterson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

 

-It gives Dave a whole year to eyeball who he wants for the vacancy.

He's had 4 years to contemplate that and learn from it.... hes too busy with the soccer team.... the disneyland in SC... the CLT uptown funk...the foundry... and i'm sure hes still involved with appaloosa ...his first love... we suck cause hes not devoting the time to putting a product on the field...he wants to make money... none of mine is he getting..fk him..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mccafrey slander and rush to get rid of him is maddening. He is the only person on this planet that can get positive yards behind our OL. He takes 2 yard losses and turns them into 3 yard games. He IS the Carolina offense. 

to replace him you’d need to find a 1000 rusher AND a 1000 receiver. And don’t say he can’t stay healthy because I truthfully believe he’d be playing if there was any reason to play. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

The mccafrey slander and rush to get rid of him is maddening. He is the only person on this planet that can get positive yards behind our OL. He takes 2 yard losses and turns them into 3 yard games. He IS the Carolina offense. 

to replace him you’d need to find a 1000 rusher AND a 1000 receiver. And don’t say he can’t stay healthy because I truthfully believe he’d be playing if there was any reason to play. 

So what you’re saying is CMC is either refusing to play or that Rhule doesn’t want him playing? CMC has played less than ten games the last two years, He can’t stay healthy and we need to get something for him before it’s too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, glitchh8 said:

Bieniemy, the Chief's OC, is who I hoped for instead of Rhule. So fire Rhule and grab him Monday afternoon already, Mr. Tepper!

I like Leftwich the Bucs offensive coordinator a little better personally. Doesn't Andy Reid do Bieniemy's job for him basically from what I've read? This is what has made Bieniemy stick around as a candidate for a head coaching job longer with him not truly having all the duties of a full offensive coordinator like control of play calling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pro game is too advanced for Rhule. Every game is miserable and follows the same script. 
Rhule hired his buddies from the college world for his staff and they are completely outclassed by other NFL teams 

Tepper hired Rhule because he said Rhule reminded him of himself. Are you kidding me? Is there anything more egotistical than this lol


There is so much ‘gone wrong’ since the hire. Just a total messy diaper of a situation

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...