Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule on the OC search

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

 

When you don't have a qb who can pass the ball or an o line who has the ability to protect him, what is left ?

Well, he claims we are suppose to be building into something. 

the vision is apparently outdated football 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PandaMan Mentor

PandaMan

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, ickmule said:

Please go away.  Please. 

He reminds me so much of my roommate’s Pomeranian-Chihuahua mix.  She’s always finding a way to get in my bed and bug the fug out of me at 7 AM when you simply want her to go.  the fug.  away.  The constant verbal diarrhea is also a troubling similarity, as well as spinning in circles while accomplishing nothing 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

Feel like me possibly could have a reverse BoB situation on our hands. Reverse because at least BoB had some success with the Texans he was just a terrible GM. But the ownership stubbornly didn't fire him when they should have and he destroyed the team in one offseason.

Now we have an owner who is stubbornly not firing a coach who has destroyed the team in one offseason, you could say it started in 2020 but it really came to a head in 2021. Rhule has had no success at the NFL level and now he wants to hire an OC to play outdated football that this team is not built to run.

I don't know what is gonna happen tomorrow, but how Rhule is talking sounds like nothing is gonna change and he is still gonna have too much control as he does now despite the product on the field being his creation.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The number 1 seeds in both conferences are run first football teams. They use the run to set up the pass. 

It’s still a passing league.   Look at the Super Bowl winners and the playoffs in general. 

I wouldn’t call the Green Bay Packers a run first team.  

seems pointless not to build your team to take advantage of the rules and era you play in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newbie Experienced

Newbie

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

A wise man once said, "Sometimes, the answer is on your own roster."

I think he and Joe Judge are going to be fired tomorrow.

He needs to be fired immediately. His strategy could be to drag the process out long enough where all the good HC candidates fill the available vacancies and complete their staffs with the best coaches available. At that point, what’s Tepper going to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...