Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule set to appear on WFNZ Thursday morning


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BurnNChinn said:

So don’t know if anyone caught this but near 17:50 mark of the interview he’s talking about BC and this upcoming draft. He says whatever Panthers decide to do at #6 in the draft. Is that me or should he be saying who we decide to take in this years draft? 

Nah he is passing blame.  He did that a few times in the interview.  It wasnt conspicuous. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, trueblade said:

In case you are out of the area and didn't hear the interview, he's what Rhule said about Slater.

 

As @Zod said, I too, am less confident in Rhule than I was yesterday.

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

He said it was too high for a guard.  So fug him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

I have trouble thinking anything Rhule says is honest/transparent at this point. Dude has zero credibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Monrowed said:

To be fair and honest, he also said something that is missing from the quote. He said that because Slater had missed the prior year and he did not have the ideal measurable they were not comfortable taking him ahead of Penai or Jaycee. He did not say that they would not have taken Slater if the other two were not there.

People seem to be leaving this part out of the thread.

I like that he admitted making a mistake with how he played BC but I also liked how he said he didn't want to David Carr BC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Again, I have no clue what this moron was thinking when he said that.  That is literally the worst possible answer he could have given.

Honestly its so bad and getting so much national attention from players and personel it's embarrassing. It is all over my twitter feed from national reporters and entities.

Edited by thunderraiden
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, thunderraiden said:

Honestly its so bad and getting so much national attention from players and personel it's embarrassing. It is all over my twitter feed from national reporters.

As soon as I heard it and posted it I figured people were going to have a field day with it.  Hopefully it shames the motherfuger into drafting a tackle at 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He would have cut Sam Mills.  Seriously-as a player, I imagine that he was told things like, "you are too small, too short, too slow, etc."  He now applies these idealistic measurables to players and it is blinding him.

Matt Rhule and Marty Hurney are at opposite ends of the spectrum on this.

Rhule is unable to see that certain players who don't fit the ideal "checkboxes" often have intangibles and other factors that make them very good players.

By contrast, Marty looked at non-ideal players and saw those intangibles and other factors when they weren't actually there.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...