Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ben McaDoo to interview for OC job

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Nah, nah not at all.  If you want to tank you roll with rhule for another year and saddle him with Darnold.  That my friend is how you tank.  I promise you with 100% certainty if that is the combo going into 2022 season we are locked and loaded for a top draft pick

That’s not real tanking though.   That’s just sucking.  And then you end up with like the #7 pick or something. 

and it’s totally pointless.  Because Rhule is trying to win and will use resources and give contracts that will impact us after he is gone. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cuttinedge Rising Star

Cuttinedge

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's stupid.

Going this route wastes a year's worth of career for players, staff and others while also risking that Rhule will make moves that worsen the team even further.

But since Tepper is a dumbsh-t on football matters, it wouldn't necessarily surprise me.

Going this route of keeping rhule for a mulligan year for a new coach Doesn’t make sense. 
Like you said players lose a year of their career basically playing for a no win situation 
I do believe  you’ll see a lot of players take a “McCaffrey “ next year with some suspicious injuries. Except maybe for the ones in a contract year 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cuttinedge said:

Going this route of keeping rhule for a mulligan year for a new coach Doesn’t make sense. 
Like you said players lose a year of their career basically playing for a no win situation 
I do believe  you’ll see a lot of players take a “McCaffrey “ next year with some suspicious injuries. Except maybe for the ones in a contract year 

What players are you worried about?  This is a roster on the whole devoid of talent

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

That’s not real tanking though.   That’s just sucking.  And then you end up with like the #7 pick or something. 

and it’s totally pointless.  Because Rhule is trying to win and will use resources and give contracts that will impact us after he is gone. 

 

Rhule will be and should be neutered going forwarded

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)

Scottie Montgomery or Ben Macadoo????????

 

Given the NY ties, Ben feels like the leader....hard to figure this out, I swear those have to be the two worse choices you can pick, is Rhule trying improve the O or ____________?? 

As of now Ben is the best, is there room on the fire Rhule bus...... I need proven NFL coaches with the 3 hires, not some BS Rhule"the way we do things, blah blah...."  Guys that been there done that, more than once..... Dont F this up Rhule....

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cuttinedge Rising Star

Cuttinedge

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What players are you worried about?  This is a roster on the whole devoid of talent

Agree there is limited talent but nonetheless I wouldn’t blame shaq ,cmc ,DJ , moton , chinn ,  burns or horn to not risk it all for a lame duck pos coach that the owner is letting have a mulligan year until he can hire a new coach 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cuttinedge Rising Star

Cuttinedge

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Rhule will be and should be neutered going forwarded

 

He should be but will he be. And if tepper has to put those constraints on him as he should then why keep him at all.  
rhule ain’t the answer cut bait before he has a chance to sabotage the next coach 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jmac
      No more mistakes on draft day...

      By Jmac · Posted

      Panthers cannot afford to overlook the defense anymore in the draft. I wouldn't  invest a number number one pick on a QB again in this draft...always a roll of the dice. To many areas of dire need. Choose Dl, Edge or LB for our first round pick. Add another Oline player in the middle rounds. No more PROJECTS or INJURED players please. The QB situation is dicey. Will he ever emerge due to his limited physical abilities or not? They obviously need a plan B on the roster. I hate to say it, but maybe a veteran like Winston for Canales to work with would be an option short term. This season is going down the drain fast.         
    • strato
      Be careful what you wish for

      By strato · Posted

      I did not watch the game just the breakdowns. I haven’t watched any defensive stuff of us.    Obviously did not know that. But no designated Hail Mary thrower, Bryce remains alone at the ‘top’. 
    • WhoKnows
      So...Those 2 Point Conversions

      By WhoKnows · Posted

      If we were a top offense, I’d agree but we aren’t so our chance of getting 3 2 pointers is basically 0. There were two calls. Go for 2, which I understand but don’t agree based on our futility, and the actual play call, which was awful both times. Play action fake with a leak out and/or rollout to increase the number of opportunities like a QB run in or multiple targets. We, unfortunately, limited ourselves to one chance and after the first run was stuffed you’d think we wouldn’t do the same thing twice but we did and got the same result.
×
×
  • Create New...