Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Today's Games


Catsfan69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CPantherKing said:

Burrow is greatness. He proved it. Dominant performance. MVP. GOAT.

Trent Dilfer and Joe Flacco approved

Let me know when he reaches Jake Delhomme or Rex Grossman GREATNESS status

First QB in NFL to throw for over 300 yards in the playoffs and NOT pass for a TD. Legend status.

Tell me how he hurt you.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Burrow is greatness. He proved it. Dominant performance. MVP. GOAT.

Trent Dilfer and Joe Flacco approved

Let me know when he reaches Jake Delhomme or Rex Grossman GREATNESS status

First QB in NFL to throw for over 300 yards in the playoffs and NOT pass for a TD. Legend status.

It’s the whole season not just this game dumb dumb. Dude made clutch throw after clutch throw and was getting demolished in the pocket to the tune of 9 sacks. That is greatness for a 2nd year qb with no oline. Most qbs fold with that kind of pressure. He stepped up in the pocket and made the throw that won against the #1 seed to go to the afc championship game. You put a real oline in front of him and he’s gonna take that team to the super bowl. I think they get beat in the championship game but if you can’t see great qb play then whatever.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CPantherKing said:

Burrow is greatness. He proved it. Dominant performance. MVP. GOAT.

Trent Dilfer and Joe Flacco approved

Let me know when he reaches Jake Delhomme or Rex Grossman GREATNESS status

First QB in NFL to throw for over 300 yards in the playoffs and NOT pass for a TD. Legend status.

Go home. You're drunk and making a complete ass of yourself.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...