Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Getting 2013 QB draft class vibes


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

He don’t want to come here either lol. Didn’t u see he wants to be traded to a contender, so that’s out. Which I don’t want him anyway 

I don't think he really has the sway to dictate his destination like Stafford did or that Watson does with his no trade clause. Jimmy G's options are likely to be more limited. I can't see a contender trading significant assets for him. What would say the Broncos or Steelers be willing to give up for a stop gap? I definitely don't think it would be a 1st.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think he really has the sway to dictate his destination like Stafford did or that Watson does with his no trade clause. Jimmy G's options are likely to be more limited. I can't see a contender trading significant assets for him. What would say the Broncos or Steelers be willing to give up for a stop gap? I definitely don't think it would be a 1st.

Nope I agree I read the 49ers just want second or third for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Nope I agree I read the 49ers just want second or third for him. 

Then a dumbass like Rhule comes screaming in with a 1st and they say, "Sorry Jimmy, you're going to Carolina. Suck it up for a year and then hit free agency. Find a spot to compete for a starting job for a good organization or we'd love to have you back here as a backup."

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

Welp. The good news is that the Bills picked Manuel and LOOK AT THEM NOW! That’s gotta mean something. 

Tbh, drafting a bad qb in the first isn't the death sentence it used to be.  More and more teams are willing to move on after a couple years, during which time other aspects of the team can grow too.  

I'd still rather not draft Pickett at 6 but oh well.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Tbh, drafting a bad qb in the first isn't the death sentence it used to be.  More and more teams are willing to move on after a couple years, during which time other aspects of the team can grow too.  

I'd still rather not draft Pickett at 6 but oh well.

I’d be much happier with Willis or even Strong. I have no interest in Pickett. He played a weak schedule as a 5th year senior in a bad division. He did what he SHOULD have done as basically the most senior player in the entire conference….

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yea when teams see a gun charge they rightly pause but this seems like a big misunderstanding. 
    • Sorry man you lost me at "Teppers have evolved as owners". Limped into playoffs at 8-9 not even above .500 Tepper is trash as an owner bro and that's not even a discussion at this point. 37-83 w/l ratio. Nuff said.... Morgan tho, he's cooking and it ain't cuz of Teppers leadership
    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
×
×
  • Create New...