Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Down or Trade Away Player(s)


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was goofing around with the Draft Simulators and did one without any trades. Our first two picks are 6 and 106.  100 spots in-between picks.  No 2nd and No 3rd.

Is that pick at 6 worth holding onto knowing we have no more picks until all of the potential starters have been drafted? We are basically giving in that we will only have one starter from the 2022 draft.  I pray we don't trade away picks next year to get back into this draft which is why I am a proponent of trading down and getting a couple extra picks. 

Either that or we shop players on our roster for additional picks.  CMC being a key candidate. 

Last year i was fully against trading him but with a 2nd year of him being on the IR it just doesn't seem to be a good idea to hold onto him waiting for another injury filled season. 

How do we take advantage of this draft without sacrificing picks from 2023 and beyond?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We absolutely should not trade away future picks but that's something we've shown every willingness to do under the Rhule regime.

We should shop CMC. He's a huge contract and injury prone. I just don't know what he could honestly be expected to fetch. Given that, I guess I'd prefer we hang onto him and hope he can bounce back from the injury issues then let the next staff decide to keep him or put him on the auction block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Trading CMC is cap suicide. May as well throw that idea out the window unless we get a Trey Lance-like trade up haul.

I never really think about the cap repercussions but it obviously must be considered.

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We absolutely should not trade away future picks but that's something we've shown every willingness to do under the Rhule regime.

We should shop CMC. He's a huge contract and injury prone. I just don't know what he could honestly be expected to fetch. Given that, I guess I'd prefer we hang onto him and hope he can bounce back from the injury issues then let the next staff decide to keep him or put him on the auction block.

That is what I am most fearful about.  Rhule is on the hot seat and starts trading picks from 2023 and beyond to save is @SS.

That's kind of why I hope we trade down.  Pick up a couple extra picks in rounds 2 and 3 and still get a quality player in round one.  Fortunately for us this draft has many offensive linemen that can fill the bill.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I never really think about the cap repercussions but it obviously must be considered.

That is what I am most fearful about.  Rhule is on the hot seat and starts trading picks from 2023 and beyond to save is @SS.

That's kind of why I hope we trade down.  Pick up a couple extra picks in rounds 2 and 3 and still get a quality player in round one.  Fortunately for us this draft has many offensive linemen that can fill the bill.

$18.6 mil in dead cap if we trade him. Next year it drops to a little under $13 mil.

If we aren't trying to sign anyone in free agency this offseason, it doesn't matter if we trade him and nuke the cap.

Otherwise, that puts us at cap of roughly -$1.5 mil for 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

$18.6 mil in dead cap if we trade him. Next year it drops to a little under $13 mil.

If we aren't trying to sign anyone in free agency this offseason, it doesn't matter if we trade him and nuke the cap.

Otherwise, that puts us at cap of roughly -$1.5 mil for 2022.

I think trading Christian would be the 'quarterback in next years draft' move. Even if we're horrible next year we might have to leap frog a few teams to draft a quarterback. If that's the case we need more picks somehow, even if they're mid rounders. If we keep him it would be for a quarterback we've taken this year.

Edited by Krovvy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We absolutely should not trade away future picks but that's something we've shown every willingness to do under the Rhule regime.

We should shop CMC. He's a huge contract and injury prone. I just don't know what he could honestly be expected to fetch. Given that, I guess I'd prefer we hang onto him and hope he can bounce back from the injury issues then let the next staff decide to keep him or put him on the auction block.

Actually in all fairness, Rhule didn’t trade away future picks until Fitts came along.  So I don’t think you can blame Rhule entirely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't anyone on this team I would call untradeable. All are replaceable. Everyone is expendable. And we're gonna lose anyways. Few would be around by the time we're a serious contender anyways. 

Just don't trade away future picks. Or do. I don't care. We're fugged anyways for a few years if we're gonna be stupid enough to keep Rhule around.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2022 at 12:10 PM, kungfoodude said:

Trading CMC is cap suicide. May as well throw that idea out the window unless we get a Trey Lance-like trade up haul.

If we trade him pre June 1st we would lose about $4.2m in cap space, not sure if I would call that cap suicide.  If we trade him after June 1st we would actually save about $8.6m in cap space this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2022 at 12:10 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

We absolutely should not trade away future picks but that's something we've shown every willingness to do under the Rhule regime.

We should shop CMC. He's a huge contract and injury prone. I just don't know what he could honestly be expected to fetch. Given that, I guess I'd prefer we hang onto him and hope he can bounce back from the injury issues then let the next staff decide to keep him or put him on the auction block.

Usually fans overestimate what their own players are worth but we might actually be understimated what CMC would get.  You have to remember you don't trade a player, you trade their contract.

Everyone keeps talking about his massive contract but honestly its massive for us because we paid a huge signing bonus and have already restructured it once.

A team that trades for him will only be responsible for his yearly salary, of which only 8.1m of it is gaurenteed and all of that is this year.  They would basically be paying for a pay as you go contract.

Christian McCaffrey Contract Breakdowns, Salary Cap Figures, Salaries, Bonuses | Spotrac

If they keep him for 1 year it would a 8.4m contract.

2 years it would be 20.2m for two years, so only $10.1m for each year.

If they keep him for all four it will only work out to $11m a year.

$11m a year isn't a bad contract for an elite playmaker, just remember Robby's cap hit will be $16.8m

Also if he gets hurt they are only on the hook for the guaranteed salary this year.

Is there a contending type of team out there that would give a 2nd for CMC for $8m?  Someone like the BIlls or Chiefs?  What about the Cardinals or Packers?  Might make Rodgers or Murry happy/

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...