Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Peter King defends Sam Mills


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Regardless of stats… the hall of fame should be for people that have changed the game forever. He undoubtedly changed the Carolina panthers franchise forever and his presence is still felt every home game all of this time later (regardless of whether tepper wants to rid us of it!!!)

he is a no brainer hall of famer 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, TheoJay10 said:

How can this guy tweeting at Peter King really think the Panthers of all teams get “preferential treatment” dude must have been born late 90s or just be new to sports in general. 

Yeah, and to be honest even if he was speaking about the Saints they don't really get that much preference when it comes to HoF either.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good response by King, and we all know that Sam Mills should 100% be in the HOF. 

Miami fans indeed have a valid complaint about Zach Thomas not getting in, but that complaint should not involve Sam Mills name. If you wanna bring up LeRoy Butler or half of the names this year thats fine, but not Sam Mills. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those of us old enough to remember the "Dome Patrol" in New Orleans.  This was the first sign of life in New Orleans franchise.  They were doormats like today's Lions (I won't say today's Panthers).  There defense was nasty and spearheaded by Mills.  Before the Panthers came along I actually routed for them because there defense was special and I like Bobby Hebert.

At 5'9" you would think he would get run over by 6 ft plus offensive linemen but he always was there making plays. He was a beast.   Long before he became a Panther I knew who he was.  I was super excited when we grabbed him to be an Charter member of the Carolina Panthers.

Zach Thomas was a good player and should at some point make the HOF.  You can argue he was better but there is also an argument that Mills was better.

I saw both and I'll take Mills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I personally think Bryce is going to be an extremely good Quarterback for a long time. If you look at modern QB development, it just takes a while. The extreme athletes can get by early, but if you look at the trajectories of guys the last 10 years, were seeing a lot of slow-cooking. Jared Goff, Geno Smith, Baker, Sam Darnold, Trevor Lawrence. The list is long.  The guys that were truly special from Day 1 is an extremely short list. The list of things that college quarterbacks are responsible for gets shorter by the day with the transfer portal, and the college offenses. The list of things that NFL Quarterbacks are responsible for seems to get longer and longer each season.  I saw an interview the other day in which a rookie quarterback and center were calling plays for the offense.  I can't remember the team or the Quarterback, but I definitely remember the clip. It takes time, even for the smartest and most gifted, and the reality is, we have no idea how good or bad the coaching may be until we hear things we aren't supposed to hear anyway.  Bryce isn't perfect, but I saw in another thread, his biggest struggle is risk/reward. That is something I only expect him to improve upon. His adjustments, ability to read a defense, and execution have been extremely good considering our rosters in his tenure here. Our offensive personnel and coaching were both so poor his rookie year that I'm not sure it's fair to properly evaluate that at all. Since that time, all we've seen from him is growth and progress. 
    • Not really.  The run defense has been solid except for the opening game and New England.  We shut Arizona's run game down, but early turnovers hurt.  And of course, we shut out Atlanta.    
    • True, Bryce having a weaker arm wouldn’t be a big deal if it was paired with… Great accuracy, ball placement, etc. But it’s not.  Bryce has consistently done 2 things all 3 seasons.  One of the lowest completion % in the NFL each year,  one of the highest bad throws % in the NFL.    Then you can get into his unwillingness to stress a D and how that has allowed safeties and DBs  cheat coverage making the small ball so many QBs enjoy a tougher task.
×
×
  • Create New...