Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Name something specific that would get you pumped for this season


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, travisura said:

Honestly surprised he hasn't done this already. It would truly separate himself and the team from the Richardson era. And it'd be a quick easy way to sell merch if they look good.

If he does this, and the Panthers fans simply don't spend the money...maybe just maybe that would open some eyes.

IMO it reeks of desperation....much like brining back Cam.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

If he does this, and the Panthers fans simply don't spend the money...maybe just maybe that would open some eyes.

IMO it reeks of desperation....much like brining back Cam.

Maybe the folks on this board wouldn't spend their money, but I have a feeling the fan base as a whole probably would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We stop talking about you know who. 😉

Nah, look ... this team/FO sucks. We've always sucked minus a handful of seasons. Just embrace that and enjoy watching football on Sundays. Don't get invested. It'll only bring you down. Nothing will make me run to the TV each week ... as I'm already going to be watching. Now, we start having back to back winning seasons and turn into a yearly team to watch? Ok, I'd allow myself to get pumped. But here we are in 2022 and ...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

Maybe the folks on this board wouldn't spend their money, but I have a feeling the fan base as a whole probably would.

 

Spending money on a team doesn't make you a good fan, not if they aren't even trying to put out a competitive product.  The only feedback we have as fans is our time and money.  The Panthers will get neither of mine until they are serious about at least attempting to win.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

 

Spending money on a team doesn't make you a good fan, not if they aren't even trying to put out a competitive product.  The only feedback we have as fans is our time and money.  The Panthers will get neither of mine until they are serious about at least attempting to win.

Oh I agree completely. I'm just thinking that a rollout of new uniforms would inevitably lead to people buying the new jerseys and merch, etc., regardless of how the team was playing. But as you said, the best way to earn more money is to put a winning product on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

We stop talking about you know who. 😉

Nah, look ... this team/FO sucks. We've always sucked minus a handful of seasons. Just embrace that and enjoy watching football on Sundays. Don't get invested. It'll only bring you down. Nothing will make me run to the TV each week ... as I'm already going to be watching. Now, we start having back to back winning seasons and turn into a yearly team to watch? Ok, I'd allow myself to get pumped. But here we are in 2022 and ...

Your anti-Cam obsession is weird, man.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

Nothing would make me happy. No FA signings leading to more comp picks. No wasting cap on Robby type deals. Just draft OL and nothing else. Admit that we aren’t making the playoffs and actually make moves to secure a future run.

Unfortunately, fat baby faced soon to be fired morons don’t build for the future.

They burn it all down now to  justify their own pathetic existence in vain.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CarolinaLivin said:

You have to think his final say isn't the same as last year. Tepper either told Rhule what kind of coaches to bring in (one's with more experience), which could still be Rhule having final say. Just not his selecting the crop to interview. I think our OC is bringing in the guys he wants, and Rhule has final say/makes the hire from that group. My second guess is Tepper is letting the fear of Rhule losing his job kind of make him want more experience around him.

It's in his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1a. Fire Rhule. I know too little too late to with all the other positions already filled.

1b. IF our draft played out something like this but only if 1a is met because I don't trust Rhule to pull this off.

IF the top 3 tackles are gone, AND Thibadeaux or Hutchinson are available, take them, then..

Trade Burns and our 2023 3rd to Philly for 15 and 19. (separate thread about why already)

Draft Linderbaum at 15

Trade 19 to Detroit for 32 and 34. Detroit takes their QB since I don't think one goes at 2 but one could possible go in the 20s, at 32 we take Raimann, Penning or Petit-Frere, whichever is the best of the 3 available. 

Pick 34 we take Muma, Cine or Brisker or Zion Johnson if all 3 of those are gone.

Yes we would lose Burns, but would gain an elite level edge rusher prospect, top center, address the tackle position, address LB, S or guard and save 15m on the cap next season. 

Again, I would only want to see this if Rhule was gone, otherwise he would just fug it all up and we'd end up with some Baylor alum that was going to go UDFA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...